Why are people calling this a data breach? As I understand it, CA just scraped the data from users who authorized their app to do so. Am I missing something here?
Facebook suspended the account of whistleblower who exposed Cambridge Analytica
11–20 of 184 posts
Re: Facebook suspended the account of whistleblower who exposed Cambridge Analytica
#12Why are people calling this a data breach? As I understand it, CA just scraped the data from users who authorized their app to do so. Am I missing something here?
Re: Facebook suspended the account of whistleblower who exposed Cambridge Analytica
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
>The arrogance of Facebook's response to this breach Is it even clear that there was a 'breach' of any kind that Facebook was responsible for? Correct me if I'm wrong here, but it seems like the chain of events is: 1.) Third party (Aleksandr Kogan) creates 'personality quiz' app, Facebook users opt-in to share information from their profile 2.) Aleksandr Kogan hands off data gathered by the app to Cambridge Analytica…
The app was allowed to scrape friend data as well, meaning that many more people’s information got exposed. That is on facebook.
Does it mean "friends lists", or "the data of the app user's friends profiles"? And in that second case, "the data of the app user's friends visible to the app user", or "as much data as if the friends had installed the app themselves"?
Unless it's that final situation, it's exactly how I assumed Facebook scraping worked already.
Re: Facebook suspended the account of whistleblower who exposed Cambridge Analytica
#14Re: Facebook suspended the account of whistleblower who exposed Cambridge Analytica
#15The arrogance of Facebook's response to this breach, quibbling over what to call it and now this, is mind-blowing. Their "it wasn't a robbery because we left the front door open" excuse may finally bring about trans-Atlantic regulation of social media.
>The arrogance of Facebook's response to this breach Is it even clear that there was a 'breach' of any kind that Facebook was responsible for? Correct me if I'm wrong here, but it seems like the chain of events is: 1.) Third party (Aleksandr Kogan) creates 'personality quiz' app, Facebook users opt-in to share information from their profile 2.) Aleksandr Kogan hands off data gathered by the app to Cambridge Analytica…
a) Facebook was notified that CA did not delete the data; and
b) The CA-held profiles were used to target politically motivated advertising on Facebook.
One can't avoid linking the two facts. Facebook has no incentive to aggressively protect its user data when it hurts ad spending on the platform.
Re: Facebook suspended the account of whistleblower who exposed Cambridge Analytica
#16Watch how they say it was an error, if this blows up. Just watch.
Re: Facebook suspended the account of whistleblower who exposed Cambridge Analytica
#17Why are people calling this a data breach? As I understand it, CA just scraped the data from users who authorized their app to do so. Am I missing something here?
Facebook did not authorize data retention. CA’s actions were therefore unauthorized use of data, which is the textbook definition of a data breach.
Re: Facebook suspended the account of whistleblower who exposed Cambridge Analytica
#18Why are people calling this a data breach? As I understand it, CA just scraped the data from users who authorized their app to do so. Am I missing something here?
CA also scraped the data of friends of those users, meaning that many millions of people had their info exposed instead of a few hundred thousand.
Re: Facebook suspended the account of whistleblower who exposed Cambridge Analytica
#19Why are people calling this a data breach? As I understand it, CA just scraped the data from users who authorized their app to do so. Am I missing something here?
Users did not authorize the app to do any of this. You are incorrect in that assumption.
This was a data breach. Facebook also knew about it and did not care. It is a data breach made worse by likely criminal negligence.
Edit: I have been (temporarily?) banned from replying or writing comments on HN. Maybe it is because of all the downvotes. Here is my response to the comment reply below (and with this, goodbye, I'm no longer allowed to post on HN I guess).
> In what sense did they 'not authorize' this?
Users did not authorize the data that was collected by these apps to be retained for more than a day or two, as described by Facebook's terms of service for CA using the data.
Re: Facebook suspended the account of whistleblower who exposed Cambridge Analytica
#20Why are people calling this a data breach? As I understand it, CA just scraped the data from users who authorized their app to do so. Am I missing something here?
> users who authorized their app to do so. Users did not authorize the app to do any of this. You are incorrect in that assumption. This was a data breach. Facebook also knew about it and did not care. It is a data breach made worse by likely criminal negligence. Edit: I have been (temporarily?) banned from replying or writing comments on HN. Maybe it is because of all the downvotes. Here is my response to the commen…
Are you saying their accounts were hacked? In what sense did they 'not authorize' this?