Which weight will lift first as the rope is pulled?
11–20 of 63 posts
Re: Which weight will lift first as the rope is pulled?
#12Its not a static system; the question is unfair.
Why does that make it unfair?
1. There is a floor that the weights (and the man) are standing on.
2. Weight C is dropping whether he pulls the rope or not.
I think that the diagram is meant to show all the weights resting on a floor, and all the confusion is due to misunderstanding of that. In the other case, the diagram neglects to mention something to the effect of "supports have just been removed".
Re: Which weight will lift first as the rope is pulled?
#13Its not a static system; the question is unfair.
Why does that make it unfair?
Depending on your level with maths/physics you'll probably give different answers and make different assumptions.
Re: Which weight will lift first as the rope is pulled?
#14If the man does nothing, the heaviest weight will fall and the lightest will rise. If it's frictionless and he starts pulling, the same thing will happen, only the lengths will lessen.
Re: Which weight will lift first as the rope is pulled?
#15Well, the diagram is impossible unless the weights are all resting on the floor, so let's assume they are. This system will find a steady state only at a local minimum of potential energy, so the lightest weight will be lifted before the heavier two get off the ground.
pulleys: idealized, massless, frictionless
rope: idealized, massless, doesn't stretch
weights: resting on ground.
As tension is applied to the rope, Weight A will be lifted first, until it is lifted to the ceiling. Then Weight B, and finally Weight A.It helps to visualize Weight A as being massless. In that case, there would just be extra slack in the rope, and B&C would not move until the slack was taken in.
Re: Which weight will lift first as the rope is pulled?
#16Re: Which weight will lift first as the rope is pulled?
#17If the system is frictionless, the rope is weightless, and the weights are not supported, then the lighter weight will rise and the heavier weight(s) will fall. Therefore if the rope is pulled very slowly, the lighter weight will rise first. If the rope really is weightless and the pulleys really are fictionless (and inertialess) then it doesn't matter how hard or fast you pull, the lighter weight will rise first. Th…
Re: Which weight will lift first as the rope is pulled?
#18 - Friction of the pulleys
- Mass of the pulleys
- Moment of inertia of the pulleys
- Mass of the rope
- Unit of mass of the weights
- Is there a surface that the weights are resting on?
- What's the local gravity like?
- Others
If we assume the things we're likely supposed to (rope mass, pulley friction, pulley mass and moment of inertia all insignificant, gravity tending down, resting on a surface), it's clear that the lightest weight will rise first. If, on the other hand, we make ridiculous assumptions (weights mass in AMU, in a no-gravity environment, high moment of inertia pulleys), then the "heavy" weight will lift first (because it's easier to lift the weight than to spin the pulleys).Re: Which weight will lift first as the rope is pulled?
#19Re: Which weight will lift first as the rope is pulled?
#20If the system is frictionless, the rope is weightless, and the weights are not supported, then the lighter weight will rise and the heavier weight(s) will fall. Therefore if the rope is pulled very slowly, the lighter weight will rise first. If the rope really is weightless and the pulleys really are fictionless (and inertialess) then it doesn't matter how hard or fast you pull, the lighter weight will rise first. Th…
Your conclusion is incorrect given your assumptions. You are assuming no floor, in which case all the weights will rise. Only the man will fall. I think the problem was intended to include a floor that simply isn't drawn.
Let me expand.
I only assumed the weights were unsupported, not the man. I did that to assist the reader in understanding the analysis. I did not assume the man was unsupported - I had hoped my initial description of what happens implied that. Possibly it didn't.
I would expect that the problem is intended to include the floor - that's not my point. Having made the analysis for the unsupported weights, the evolution of the situation when there is a floor becomes obvious.
So I hope you were joking, and not a troll.