Live data from Hacker News

Microsoft again forced upgrades on Win10 PCs specifically set to block updates

computerworld.com

111–120 of 138 posts

Re: Microsoft again forced upgrades on Win10 PCs specifically set to block updates

#111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's one side of the story. There are still huge numbers of casual and home users who are much better off with automatic updates and the reflex to disable them due to being a minor annoyance has to go.

> There are still huge numbers of casual and home users who are much better off with automatic updates and the reflex to disable them due to being a minor annoyance has to go. Outside of gamers, though, most of them couldn't care less about Windows and continue to use it because it's what came with the laptop. This is an irretrievably shrinking market. I admit Microsoft is in a bind here. A huge legacy install base t…

Let's take a look at what the "opting out" looked like:

"OMG OMG, there's a completely different thing in the computer than there was yesterday! Make it go away!! I didn't touch nothing this time!!!" And lo and behold, there was indeed a completely different OS, without any attempt at obtaining user consent (or, even worse, against the expressed denial of consent). Are you surprised that the users "opted out" of further violations of expectations?

TL;DR: nonconsensual "upgrade" bad; perhaps the tea analogy didn't quite register with MS? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQbei5JGiT8

Re: Microsoft again forced upgrades on Win10 PCs specifically set to block updates

#112

As an HN reader, I believe I am qualified to comment on the strategic direction of a major multi-billion-dollar software company. By pushing to make Windows as idiot-proof as possible, Microsoft is zagging when it should zig. They've basically lost the mass market. The e-mail checking machine in the kitchen has been replaced by a tablet, and it doesn't run Windows. Their only hope is to position Windows as the OS for…

> As an HN reader, I believe I am qualified...

Yes, those qualifications being: 1) Have a browser. 2) Be able to type your words.

> By pushing to make Windows as idiot-proof as possible... They've basically lost the mass market. The e-mail checking machine in the kitchen has been replaced by a tablet...

I've never known anyone to have an "e-mail" checking machine in their kitchen. I do know lots of folks who work at home though and they all use Windows.

> Their only hope is to position Windows as the OS for people who want to get serious work done...

OK, done and done.

> ...because it's never been easier to find an alternative...

Go ahead, find one. I'll wait. Please tell me what OS is going to replace Windows??

> Telemetry. User-hostile update policies. Minecraft in the start menu. Pushing a Microsoft account for desktop login. These things are not office-user friendly...

Telemetry, updates and games have been part of Windows since forever. None of this is new. Search for: Office 2000 Customer Experience Improvement. You'll find people asking how to turn it off.

Re: Microsoft again forced upgrades on Win10 PCs specifically set to block updates

#113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because while Microsoft is one huge entity, it isn’t run the same in every department. While one department might be hugely user friendly, another won’t.

Which microsoft departments would you consider user friendly, and why?

Nothing that Microsoft is doing is shady and every department is user friendly.

There. I've argued my points as well as you have yours.

Re: Microsoft again forced upgrades on Win10 PCs specifically set to block updates

#114

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> There are still huge numbers of casual and home users who are much better off with automatic updates and the reflex to disable them due to being a minor annoyance has to go. Outside of gamers, though, most of them couldn't care less about Windows and continue to use it because it's what came with the laptop. This is an irretrievably shrinking market. I admit Microsoft is in a bind here. A huge legacy install base t…

Let's take a look at what the "opting out" looked like: "OMG OMG, there's a completely different thing in the computer than there was yesterday! Make it go away!! I didn't touch nothing this time!!!" And lo and behold, there was indeed a completely different OS, without any attempt at obtaining user consent (or, even worse, against the expressed denial of consent). Are you surprised that the users "opted out" of furt…

> Are you surprised that the users "opted out" of further violations of expectations?

Not in the least. Like I said, I think MS is terrified of another Conficker, and they reacted in the worst possible way by trying to coerce people into applying updates. Worse, not all of those updates were truly for the users' benefit, and some of them rendered the user's computer inoperable. The not-unexpected result is that people, especially the less sophisticated userbase we're talking about, have moved from total indifference towards updates to moderate distrust.

Re: Microsoft again forced upgrades on Win10 PCs specifically set to block updates

#115

As an HN reader, I believe I am qualified to comment on the strategic direction of a major multi-billion-dollar software company. By pushing to make Windows as idiot-proof as possible, Microsoft is zagging when it should zig. They've basically lost the mass market. The e-mail checking machine in the kitchen has been replaced by a tablet, and it doesn't run Windows. Their only hope is to position Windows as the OS for…

> As an HN reader, I believe I am qualified... Yes, those qualifications being: 1) Have a browser. 2) Be able to type your words. > By pushing to make Windows as idiot-proof as possible... They've basically lost the mass market. The e-mail checking machine in the kitchen has been replaced by a tablet... I've never known anyone to have an "e-mail" checking machine in their kitchen. I do know lots of folks who work at…

> I've never known anyone to have an "e-mail" checking machine in their kitchen.

I saw a lot of that in years past. Seems that there was a trend for awhile to have a builtin desk in the kitchen, and that desk typically had a Windows computer on it. I doubt many of these people used it for more than email and basic stuff.

> Go ahead, find one. I'll wait. Please tell me what OS is going to replace Windows??

I'm seeing Linux slowly take over on workstations, both at home and at the office. I'm no longer surprised to find Linux installed where previously it would have been unheard of.

These are just my observations, though.

Re: Microsoft again forced upgrades on Win10 PCs specifically set to block updates

#116
post #49

Oh boy, this happened to me despite using the enterprise edition. The system forced an upgrade, despite me doing everything to stop it, and every time the upgrade crashed and I had to roll back to the previous version. Every day. I spent a month like this, on an always-on system, trying to shut down the upgrade downloader from the task bar whenever I can after failing to stop it from settings, group policy, horsing a…

Couldn't you just disable the Windows Update service?

Seems to work fine for me and then you can update manually with a tool like http://www.windowsupdatesdownloader.com/ or maybe http://www.wsusoffline.net/

Re: Microsoft again forced upgrades on Win10 PCs specifically set to block updates

#117

As an HN reader, I believe I am qualified to comment on the strategic direction of a major multi-billion-dollar software company. By pushing to make Windows as idiot-proof as possible, Microsoft is zagging when it should zig. They've basically lost the mass market. The e-mail checking machine in the kitchen has been replaced by a tablet, and it doesn't run Windows. Their only hope is to position Windows as the OS for…

> By pushing to make Windows as idiot-proof as possible, Microsoft is zagging when it should zig. [...] Their only hope is to position Windows as the OS for people who want to get serious work done

Arguably that's what they are doing by making Windows as idiot-proof as possible. For all their accidental botnets, the home users forgetting or not knowing to keep their machines updated are one problem, sure, but let's not forget that the real villains in not keeping Windows machines up to date are all in Enterprise IT. There are so many people actively working to keep machines out of date in the name of keeping their jobs "easy" or "stability", and that should be a staggering statistic.

I've got a feeling the number of Fortune 5,000 companies that have contributed to botnets is incredibly underreported, and I've got a feeling the number of Fortune 500 companies that have only avoided that fate by raw luck and bubble gum is a lot bigger than people think.

> Telemetry

Enterprise loves Telemetry. They want your machine to spy on all your activities. They want to complain that you spend too much time on HN and accidentally glance at articles related to "Gaming" during work time because they have a cool HN discussion thread.

Admittedly, some are overtly mad at Microsoft for getting access to that data themselves and trying to use some telemetry to improve their products, but how many of those complaining are covertly excited that they get access to the same data in tools like System Center?

> User-hostile update policies.

Per above, Enterprises have shown they need to be forced to update too.

> Pushing a Microsoft account for desktop login.

Enterprises love accounts. It helps keep things accountable. (Terrible pun intended.) Your Microsoft account gets to connect to your Office 365 work account. They can send you reminders to your personal Microsoft Account via the Microsoft Graph to your home computer to get back to work, if you let them. With BYOD workplaces, your home computer can double as your workplace computer and you can be so productive with all your accounts communicating together in "harmony", personal and work.

For the users used to using an AD domain account every day at work, a personal Microsoft Account can make their home devices feel like a "real boy" with the nice things like profile roaming that their Enterprise AD accounts get (assuming the Enterprise doesn't turn off nice things with Group Policies and mismanagement, of course).

> These things are not office-user friendly

Except for Minecraft, these things are extremely office-user friendly. These are things Enterprises love. These are reasons why most Enterprises couldn't quit Windows if they tried.

(Even forced updates; as much as some companies are griping right now, soon it will be the new normal and corporate ITs will adjust. They'll continue to complain, having a nice scapegoat to blame in Microsoft for update failures, but they'll also likely enjoy the perks of the new regime eventually as they realize that tech debt of not updating was its own misery and less "easy" than they thought it was.)

Re: Microsoft again forced upgrades on Win10 PCs specifically set to block updates

#118
I guess we just have to wait it out for a couple more years where windows would have suffered the same fate as Nokia and gone into the grave yard and Google upgrades their Chrome OS or Fuschia to be a desktop capable OS.

Starting to bid a slow good bye to Microsoft.

The moment they started forcing us into doing something that we don't want, their windows death cycle begins.

Also why does windows take that much space as it doesn't offer that much feature compared to the software size in GBs.

Has anyone seen those windows inside the VR, it is so dumb and stupid, y would anyone want to use windows in that way.

They have lost it.

Re: Microsoft again forced upgrades on Win10 PCs specifically set to block updates

#119

Aside from those running windows-exclusive software, I'm more and more boggled at the fact that some people still choose windows over other OSes. I couldn't imagine living with this sort of crap. To each their own, I guess

I have to use a bash script to increase/decrease brightness. The keyboard keys do nothing. My audio comes out both the headphones and speakers when the headphones are plugged in. Sometimes I have to use a bash script to make it play out the headphones. It'll still play out the speakers.

It's still a better experience than Windows 10.

Re: Microsoft again forced upgrades on Win10 PCs specifically set to block updates

#120

A platform company ought to know better: at this point in history, peoples’ entire lives (or companies’ entire data sets) are intertwined with computers. You are not just talking about a software update anymore, you are directly inserting yourself into people’s lives/businesses. That means you should not just do whatever the hell you want. Microsoft doesn’t deserve 44th or 45th chances to get it right with decades of…

No law needed, simply stop using it. Find alternatives which there are plenty. They will disappear. And our lives will be little better.
Post reply on HN