The foundation is overlooking the most unique feature of the Broadcom chipset, the 3D video support. They already have implemented the software/driver side, so only thing required is just exposing the pins from the SOC and adding second camera connector – very low hanging fruit. (The Zero board may not have enough space for routing but the bigger boards definitely have.)
New Raspberry Pi Model B+
61–70 of 220 posts
Re: New Raspberry Pi Model B+
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
I also noticed that. It's only ~280 megabits so seems a bit dishonest to call it gigabit. I guess what they mean is "gigabit ethernet standard" i.e. 1000BASE-T. Also how does it act once its internal receive buffer is full? Is it possible to get the sender to slow down, or does it have to start dropping frames? Will important things such as ARP broadcasts and DHCP requests just risk getting lost?
Probably it supports L2 pause frames (type of flow control) just like nearly any other ethernet device?
Edit: The Wikipedia article says: "By 1999, several vendors supported receiving pause frames, but fewer implemented sending them.[4][5] Pause frames have several disadvantages.".
Any idea what the situation is like today?
Re: New Raspberry Pi Model B+
#63Gigabit ethernet over usb 2? Will never reach gigabit speeds...
True, but still faster than 100Mbps, which can be nice
Re: New Raspberry Pi Model B+
#64Happy kodi server update day
Re: New Raspberry Pi Model B+
#65Gigabit ethernet over usb 2? Will never reach gigabit speeds...
Re: New Raspberry Pi Model B+
#66I wish they would finally expose the data lines for the second camera in their "hobbyist" boards as well. Currently the dual camera setup is supported only by Compute Module, but it's cumbersome to use because the bulky I/O board (and expensive). The foundation is overlooking the most unique feature of the Broadcom chipset, the 3D video support. They already have implemented the software/driver side, so only thing re…
I can see that being made into very compact 3D Scanners very quickly after launch if that was added as a feature.
Re: New Raspberry Pi Model B+
#67Why was the title changed? It's misleading right now since there's already a Raspberry Pi Model B+ available for ages. Should be "New Raspberry Pi 3 Model B+" just like on the blog post.
https://www.raspberrypi.org/products/
Edit: Didn't realize you meant the title.
Re: New Raspberry Pi Model B+
#68Power over Ethernet is terrific, this means only one cord is now needed for a fully functioning pi (assuming you have the proper Ethernet setup on the other end).
Re: New Raspberry Pi Model B+
#69Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am using a BananaPi for this. It also has a SATA port which makes it handy for a NAS. Processor and RAM are also a good bang for the buck.
What is your experience with platform support (linux) with the BananaPi?
EDIT: I should say (that's independent whether you use Raspberry or BananaPi) that both run for months without intervention. The only thing I found to be important is a good power source. I had frequently file system errors due to dying (somewhat cheap) chargers used as power source. I finally got a switched 50W multi charger (10 outlets á 2A) which I connected all Raspis and Bananas to. Since then, everything works pretty smooth.
Re: New Raspberry Pi Model B+
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
I also noticed that. It's only ~280 megabits so seems a bit dishonest to call it gigabit. I guess what they mean is "gigabit ethernet standard" i.e. 1000BASE-T. Also how does it act once its internal receive buffer is full? Is it possible to get the sender to slow down, or does it have to start dropping frames? Will important things such as ARP broadcasts and DHCP requests just risk getting lost?
When the internal receiver buffer is full, you drop the frames. Basically any protocol out there has some way of dealing with dropped packets (including UDP's "don't care") DHCP requests are usually repeated several times for this reason, the first one can get lost (this can and will happen even on a clean and underloaded gigabit homenetwork)
Traffic shaping on higher layers usually lets some packages deemed important through while dropping bulk traffic, tcp which is usually used for bulk transfers backs down when packages gets dropped, but that only gets you so far if you keep getting hammered with new connections or the sender acts maliciously.