NYTimes Obituary for Ada Lovelace

But this isn't very political, is it? An influential individual in computing gets modern recognition. Just because NYT article says that obituaries were "dominated by white men" doesn't make this political content IMO.

In any case, we don't need to be dogmatic about "rules" like the ones governing political content.

Re: NYTimes Obituary for Ada Lovelace

#5

Post by dragonwriter » Thu, Mar 08, 2018, 3:10 PM UTC

asaph wrote: post #3

nukeop wrote: post #2

Politics on Hacker News usually gets flagged.

This is political? Please explain.

Adding new historical obituaries specifically to address the issue that those other than White men were historically ignored in that section of the paper certainly seems at least related to a currently active area of identity politics.

Not that I think the comment on politics usually getting flagged was useful or necessarily accurate.

Re: NYTimes Obituary for Ada Lovelace

#6

Post by Cenk » Thu, Mar 08, 2018, 3:12 PM UTC

Some background on this: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/08/insider/overlooked-obitua...

On the topic of NYT obits, there’s a really great episode of the Longform podcast with NTY’s senior obituary writer Margalit Fox: https://longform.org/posts/longform-podcast-43-margalit-fox

Re: NYTimes Obituary for Ada Lovelace

#7

Post by nukeop » Thu, Mar 08, 2018, 3:15 PM UTC

dragonwriter wrote: post #5

asaph wrote: post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is political? Please explain.

Adding new historical obituaries specifically to address the issue that those other than White men were historically ignored in that section of the paper certainly seems at least related to a currently active area of identity politics. Not that I think the comment on politics usually getting flagged was useful or necessarily accurate.

Most people, me included, come to Hacker News for their tech-related news specifically because they don't want to see these kinds of useless, clickbaity, virtue signalling pieces.

Re: NYTimes Obituary for Ada Lovelace

#8

Post by and0 » Thu, Mar 08, 2018, 3:21 PM UTC

nukeop wrote: post #7

dragonwriter wrote: post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Adding new historical obituaries specifically to address the issue that those other than White men were historically ignored in that section of the paper certainly seems at least related to a currently active area of identity politics. Not that I think the comment on politics usually getting flagged was useful or necessarily accurate.

Most people, me included, come to Hacker News for their tech-related news specifically because they don't want to see these kinds of useless, clickbaity, virtue signalling pieces.

I enjoy articles like these, personally.

Re: NYTimes Obituary for Ada Lovelace

#9

Post by wyldfire » Thu, Mar 08, 2018, 3:34 PM UTC

nukeop wrote: post #7

dragonwriter wrote: post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Adding new historical obituaries specifically to address the issue that those other than White men were historically ignored in that section of the paper certainly seems at least related to a currently active area of identity politics. Not that I think the comment on politics usually getting flagged was useful or necessarily accurate.

Most people, me included, come to Hacker News for their tech-related news specifically because they don't want to see these kinds of useless, clickbaity, virtue signalling pieces.

It's certainly not clickbait by any convention that I know that term. It's only useless to those of us who already knew about Lovelace's contributions. But, like many reposted articles, I'm content to let them lie for the sake of other HNers who haven't seen it yet.

Re: NYTimes Obituary for Ada Lovelace

#10

Post by [deleted] » Thu, Mar 08, 2018, 4:43 PM UTC

wyldfire wrote: post #9

nukeop wrote: post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Most people, me included, come to Hacker News for their tech-related news specifically because they don't want to see these kinds of useless, clickbaity, virtue signalling pieces.

It's certainly not clickbait by any convention that I know that term. It's only useless to those of us who already knew about Lovelace's contributions. But, like many reposted articles, I'm content to let them lie for the sake of other HNers who haven't seen it yet.

[deleted]