Live data from Hacker News

Poll: Should this site be visible to Yahoo, MSN crawlers?

news.ycombinator.com

11–20 of 98 posts

Re: Poll: Should this site be visible to Yahoo, MSN crawlers?

#14
post #12

why not block all search engines?

http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Anews.ycombinator.com+y... There's no other search.

> There's no other search.

http://www.searchyc.com

(edit: I'm not the one who voted you down)

Re: Poll: Should this site be visible to Yahoo, MSN crawlers?

#15
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Anews.ycombinator.com+y... There's no other search.

> There's no other search. http://www.searchyc.com (edit: I'm not the one who voted you down)

and

http://nycs.bigheadlabs.com/

Re: Poll: Should this site be visible to Yahoo, MSN crawlers?

#18
post #9

Why does it matter how many useless urls they visit? If you're trying to fix the "expired link" issue -- there are better ways to fix that. I think you should ban google too if you ban the others. The only disadvantage I can see is that people from here who want to find something they've seen on news.yc can't use google anymore.

Blocking a crawler is a one liner that could be done in a couple seconds. Tackling the limitations of a continuation based architecture is a bigger problem.

Re: Poll: Should this site be visible to Yahoo, MSN crawlers?

#19

My vote is to constrain growth as much as possible, at least that which comes from stupid sources. Smart hackers will find this site just fine without Yahoo or MSN, probably even Google. As "evil" as blocking sites and crawlers may sound, I think these types of measures will be necessary to preserve the quality of content here. Whatever actions further that objective have my vote.

Not evil at all. Letting someone crawl your site is a business decision. If you think the resource cost on your servers is worth the added traffic that the search engine can send, then go for it. For this site, I would guess the resource cost is more (because of storing continuations) and the benefit of traffic is less (since pg doesn't even want it). Therefore, it's a good decision on pg's part and Yahoo's loss.
Post reply on HN