> “I personally am not sure what the solution is for these companies,” said Mr. Rosenzweig. “I don’t see a good answer because the Chinese government is really putting them between a rock and a hard place.” I don't think this is that hard of a decision, is it? Just say no and cut ties with efforts for China as a market. Any profits there are not worth jeopardizing all of the privacy and precedents that are being slow…
I think it's too late. Bill Clinton sold them enough tech in the 90s in exchange for defense contractor kickbacks that now China has passed the US in military technology. China has too much influence and money on too many US campuses and has students demanding repeal of the 1st, 2nd, and 4th amendments, which will help continue the growth of Chinese power. Xi Jinping is explicit in his goal to bring democracy to an e…
China hasn't come close to passing the US in military technology in fact.
Technologically they're behind the US in: destroyers, submarines, helicopters, drones, laser weapons, satellites, integrated command systems, aircraft carriers, ICBMs and general nuclear weapon technology, tanks, bombers, jet fighters. In several of these categories, China is extremely far behind.
The Germans, French, British and Russians also have countless military gear that is still technologically well ahead of China. Overall, Russia's military technology capabilities are well ahead of China. China still struggles with primitives like jet engines, which Russia has long since mastered.
China still can't field a single long range aircraft carrier. Currently they're unable to push their military projection much beyond Japan and limited parts of the Indian Ocean. The US has true global force projection to practically every corner of the globe. Will China catch up? Plausibly; it'll take 30 years for them to build all the bases necessary to do it.