Time to move to C11 atomics? (2016)
1–10 of 10 posts
Re: Time to move to C11 atomics? (2016)
#2Re: Time to move to C11 atomics? (2016)
#3From June 15, 2016. They reference GCC 7.1 as being a year away...
Re: Time to move to C11 atomics? (2016)
#4From June 15, 2016. They reference GCC 7.1 as being a year away...
Is this a thing now?
Re: Time to move to C11 atomics? (2016)
#5I think the ISO C and C++ definition of memory_order_consume will need to be fixed first. Perhaps recent progress has been made, but see for example "C++ P0371R1: Temporarily discourage memory_order_consume" and references therein:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2016/p037...
Re: Time to move to C11 atomics? (2016)
#6From June 15, 2016. They reference GCC 7.1 as being a year away...
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/:
GCC 7.1
May 2, 2017 (changes, documentation)
Re: Time to move to C11 atomics? (2016)
#7Maybe the best thing to do is to write a really, really, really good test suite for the C11 compiler first.
Re: Time to move to C11 atomics? (2016)
#8From reading the article it seems they present many negatives and no benefits.
Re: Time to move to C11 atomics? (2016)
#9Maybe the best thing to do is to write a really, really, really good test suite for the C11 compiler first.
I think u can propose it for C22