Live data from Hacker News

How Do We Learn?

blog.ncase.me

51–60 of 64 posts

Re: How Do We Learn?

#51
If you want to know the answer to this question, you have to look at the amygdala.

This dual set of brain regions are gatekeepers to long-term memory.

They/it only lets in things it thinks you might need later.

And it grades this need based on emotion.

So, if you want to recall something later, you need a purpose, and if the purpose ties into something emotional, all the better.

(I know some people are going to fight me on the assertion that emotion regulates memory, but do a little research before telling me I'm wrong.)

Re: How Do We Learn?

#52

This seems more like "How Do We Memorize?", as is taught and performed (poorly) in American schools. In contrast we learn by doing , by manipulating things or concepts.

Committing things to long-term memory is an absolutely essential component of any sort of learning. There are many studies talking about how doing doesn't necessarily imply any learning at all and only implies learning insofar as it leads to committing information to long-term memory. Furthermore, there are studies talking about how problem-based/inquiry-based learning (what it sounds like you might be thinking of) g…

It would be helpful if you would cite the studies that allegedly support your statements about the poor results of learning-by-doing. As previous poster points out “committing things to long-term memory” is memorization, a small part of learning.

Re: How Do We Learn?

#53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Committing things to long-term memory is an absolutely essential component of any sort of learning. There are many studies talking about how doing doesn't necessarily imply any learning at all and only implies learning insofar as it leads to committing information to long-term memory. Furthermore, there are studies talking about how problem-based/inquiry-based learning (what it sounds like you might be thinking of) g…

It would be helpful if you would cite the studies that allegedly support your statements about the poor results of learning-by-doing. As previous poster points out “committing things to long-term memory” is memorization, a small part of learning.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_...

"Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching"

> Evidence for the superiority of guided instruction is explained in the context of our knowledge of human cognitive architecture, expert–novice differences, and cognitive load. Although unguided or minimally guided instructional approaches are very popular and intuitively appealing, the point is made that these approaches ignore both the structures that constitute human cognitive architecture and evidence from empirical studies over the past half-century that consistently indicate that minimally guided instruction is less effective and less efficient than instructional approaches that place a strong emphasis on guidance of the student learning process. The advantage of guidance begins to recede only when learners have sufficiently high prior knowledge to provide “internal” guidance. Recent developments in instructional research and instructional design models that support guidance during instruction are briefly described.

Re: How Do We Learn?

#54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It would be helpful if you would cite the studies that allegedly support your statements about the poor results of learning-by-doing. As previous poster points out “committing things to long-term memory” is memorization, a small part of learning.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_... "Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching" > Evidence for the superiority of guided instruction is explained in the context of our knowledge of human cognitive architecture, expert–novice differences, and cognitive load. Although…

Choice quotes include:

> The past half-century of empirical research on this issue has provided overwhelming and unambiguous evidence that minimal guidance during instruction is significantly less effective and efficient than guidance specifically designed to support the cognitive processing necessary for learning.

> Our understanding of the role of long-term memory in human cognition has altered dramatically over the last few decades. It is no longer seen as a passive repository of discrete, isolated fragments of information that permit us to repeat what we have learned. Nor is it seen only as a component of human cognitive architecture that has merely peripheral influence on complex cognitive processes such as thinking and problem solving. Rather, long-term memory is now viewed as the central, dominant structure of human cognition.

> These results suggest that expert problem solvers derive their skill by drawing on the extensive experience stored in their long-term memory and then quickly select and apply the best procedures for solving problems. The fact that these differences can be used to fully explain problem-solving skill emphasizes the importance of long-term memory to cognition. We are skillful in an area because our long-term memorycontains huge amounts of information concerning the area.

> The aim of all instruction is to alter long-term memory. If nothing has changed in long-term memory, nothing has been learned.

I'll quit there, but that's only a few pages in and it's all quite good and definitely worth reading IMO.

Re: How Do We Learn?

#55
post #51

If you want to know the answer to this question, you have to look at the amygdala. This dual set of brain regions are gatekeepers to long-term memory. They/it only lets in things it thinks you might need later. And it grades this need based on emotion. So, if you want to recall something later, you need a purpose, and if the purpose ties into something emotional, all the better. (I know some people are going to fight…

So how does one hack emotions to remember better?

Re: How Do We Learn?

#56
post #8

I took a Coursera course titled Learning How to Learn[0] and found it really helpful as an intro class to this "field". It was also very practical. [0] https://www.coursera.org/learn/learning-how-to-learn

I've also taken this course, but would recommend those new to it just read the post here, which is a good summary: https://www.reddit.com/r/GetMotivated/comments/5950tm/text_i... .

HN Needs a tip button for things like this. This is amazing. Thank you

Re: How Do We Learn?

#57
post #55
post #51

If you want to know the answer to this question, you have to look at the amygdala. This dual set of brain regions are gatekeepers to long-term memory. They/it only lets in things it thinks you might need later. And it grades this need based on emotion. So, if you want to recall something later, you need a purpose, and if the purpose ties into something emotional, all the better. (I know some people are going to fight…

So how does one hack emotions to remember better?

Have a look at NLP(neuro linguistic programming) techniques regarding memory.

An example, before you start starting studying a topic, tell yourself, consciously, why you are going to learn this specific thing, and how you want to use it. After studying, tell yourself how are you going to use the things you have just learned, imagine yourself applying them in different scenarios. Even these two simple exercises helps brain to make those connections GP told about.

I don't want to get in to the topic of whether NLP has a scientific base, just want to emphasize that most of these techniques are brought together from examining how experts relevant to the area do things that made them successful.

I don't have enough time right now for a longer answer or sources, will try to expand later.

Re: How Do We Learn?

#58
post #37
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sir and/or Madam, I feel the need to inform you that you are, more than likely, quite ill-informed. Zines are a spectacular human achievement, worthy of your attention and respect. Or, were it otherwise, how do you explain this godamn amazing piece of work: https://www.alchemistowl.org/pocorgtfo/

This looks hilarious and interesting. Reminds me of Diagram http://thediagram.com/ but PoC||GTFO seems a lot more programming specific?

Just wanted to follow up - thanks for that amazing ref! I've just blown a fat wad on some DIAGRAM merch and cannot resist wasting the rest of the day downloading the whole godamn site. WOW! Great fun! Love it! Huge TA!

Re: How Do We Learn?

#59
post #50
post #46

I don't mean to be rude and I am truly interested in this topic, but I must ask, is there a version of this that is readily legible? Fuzzy (out of focus) light grey text on a white background absolutely results in a headache for me when trying to read this.

I didn't have the visual issues so it was enjoyable for me to read. My spaced repetition system requires that I copy ideas I want to recall. I'm sharing my summary of the main ideas in case they help you. --- # Learning by Building Connection New ideas have to connect with what’s already there — they cannot be stored, as if in a filing cabinet. Throwing facts at people doesn’t work. You have to: * connect ideas to ot…

Thank you for your reply and assistance danial.

Re: How Do We Learn?

#60
post #8

I took a Coursera course titled Learning How to Learn[0] and found it really helpful as an intro class to this "field". It was also very practical. [0] https://www.coursera.org/learn/learning-how-to-learn

I've also taken this course, but would recommend those new to it just read the post here, which is a good summary: https://www.reddit.com/r/GetMotivated/comments/5950tm/text_i... .

Agree. Having done the course, I think a text summary does a good job of getting to the big ideas (I don't really like learning via video fwiw)
Post reply on HN