What are the regulatory hurdles to operating a lightning node in the US? It makes you a money transmitter, right?
I've seen nothing to suggest that a LN operator would be considered a money transmitter. Whats your best reason for thinking so, and why does your definition of money transmission not include miners?
Show HN: Lightning Network Search and Analysis Engine
41–50 of 104 posts
Re: Show HN: Lightning Network Search and Analysis Engine
#42Does anyone know how Lightening Network code actually routes nodes? The LN claim is basically decentralized BGP but much more complex and prone to race condition errors. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ug8NH67_EfE&feature=youtu.be... The white paper doesn't even mention how LN routing works! 8.4 Payment Routing It is theoretically possible to build a route map implicitly from observing 2-of-2 multisigs on the blockch…
Re: Show HN: Lightning Network Search and Analysis Engine
#43Have they solved the distributed routing problem? I watched many videos on the LN, and it's never addressed, it's always this hand-wavy explanation that a route is somehow found, on a network that changes, potentially, thousands of times per seconds, and has tens of millions of nodes.
It's not an omission, it was done this way on purpose.
Re: Show HN: Lightning Network Search and Analysis Engine
#44BCH, it should be noted, has nothing to do with Bitcoin other than appropriating the name...
Re: Show HN: Lightning Network Search and Analysis Engine
#45Re: Show HN: Lightning Network Search and Analysis Engine
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
And the blockchain history.
And living up to Satoshi's original vision of a "purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash".
Re: Show HN: Lightning Network Search and Analysis Engine
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
Where does the $10 come into play? Can they only transfer up to $10's worth of currency?
From what I understand--yes. They would need to "settle" their transfer on the blockchain and then open a new channel. The solution to this from what I've read is an IOU mechanism and a third party that has a channel with almost everyone. If the third party is rich then each channel is theoretically huge. ALICE --(IOU to bob for 10k)---> CAROL --(IOU from alice for 10k)--> BOB
Re: Show HN: Lightning Network Search and Analysis Engine
#48Does anyone know how Lightening Network code actually routes nodes? The LN claim is basically decentralized BGP but much more complex and prone to race condition errors. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ug8NH67_EfE&feature=youtu.be... The white paper doesn't even mention how LN routing works! 8.4 Payment Routing It is theoretically possible to build a route map implicitly from observing 2-of-2 multisigs on the blockch…
What do you mean "impossible to implement true decentralized routing"? Many examples of decentralized distance vector and link state algorithms exist. I'm not sure what they are doing but routing isn't some mystical thing that requires a master node.
Here's a thing I did a while ago: https://github.com/jtremback/reactive-payment-routing
Re: Show HN: Lightning Network Search and Analysis Engine
#49Does anyone know how Lightening Network code actually routes nodes? The LN claim is basically decentralized BGP but much more complex and prone to race condition errors. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ug8NH67_EfE&feature=youtu.be... The white paper doesn't even mention how LN routing works! 8.4 Payment Routing It is theoretically possible to build a route map implicitly from observing 2-of-2 multisigs on the blockch…
The whole thing is fishy. The lightning network is pushed by Blockstream, a company which has a large number of devs working on bitcoin core. They were responsible for all the propaganda and talking points against bumping the block size leading to the BCH fork, because they wanted the "correct" solution of their lightning network. The fact that it is so complex and ill defined is dangerous and an antithesis of decent…
Re: Show HN: Lightning Network Search and Analysis Engine
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
From what I understand--yes. They would need to "settle" their transfer on the blockchain and then open a new channel. The solution to this from what I've read is an IOU mechanism and a third party that has a channel with almost everyone. If the third party is rich then each channel is theoretically huge. ALICE --(IOU to bob for 10k)---> CAROL --(IOU from alice for 10k)--> BOB
I'm a bit of a BTC novice here, so help me understand something: Does this not mean that on the LN there will necessarily be BTC that's essentially "floating" in the network, that hasn't settled on the Blockchain? What does this mean for liquidity and the integrity of the network in general?