Earlier quoted context omitted.
You sort of prove the cherry picking argument. Average salary means nothing in a vacuum without cost of living considered. And when it is... Unsurprisingly NYC comes in at the bottom of the list, https://www.codementor.io/blog/best-cities-software-engineer... Seattle is actually #1
I can’t trust any of these comparisions because it’s difficult to compare apartments across cities. Average apartment costs in new york are meaningless. I know of no one paying 3k per month. Usually it’s between 1k-1.5k, which completely changes this graph.
Tech takes over: New York is the sector's second city
181–190 of 209 posts
Re: Tech takes over: New York is the sector's second city
#182I am not surprised to read this and also not sure what makes this article/publisher the assumed authority to christened NYC as #2. After Silicon Valley one might argue that Seattle has better tech than NYC but again NYC always has breadth and depth of diverse markets such finance, fashion, ads, hotel, food, law and education to name a few. Not to mention, easy access to EWR/JFK/LGA airports from European continent ma…
Seattle has better connections to Asia, given the way planes travel it is closer to Beijing, Tokyo, Seoul than any other major American city besides anchorage.
If by "better," you mean a couple of hours shorter, then Seattle may be better.
If by "better," you mean more frequent flights, more airline choices, more destinations, and more business/first class opportunities, then New York beats Seattle with just one of its three international airports. (Four if you count Stewart.)
Re: Tech takes over: New York is the sector's second city
#183Re: Tech takes over: New York is the sector's second city
#184Earlier quoted context omitted.
No I am thinking about my family and I and our experiences living there. When I say Pollution, I am not just saying air pollution. I physically felt dirty the minute I stepped out into the street after getting ready for work. I would wash my hair and it would streak of dirt. The subway is absolutely filthy. Bathrooms anywhere but expensive restaurants are filthy. Sidewalks were filthy. Streets are filthy. The water t…
> When I say Pollution, I am not just saying air pollution. I physically felt dirty the minute I stepped out into the street after getting ready for work. I would wash my hair and it would streak of dirt. The subway is absolutely filthy. Bathrooms anywhere but expensive restaurants are filthy. Sidewalks were filthy. Streets are filthy. The water that pools up at the sides of crosswalks was everywhere -- and was filth…
Re: Tech takes over: New York is the sector's second city
#185Earlier quoted context omitted.
I can’t trust any of these comparisions because it’s difficult to compare apartments across cities. Average apartment costs in new york are meaningless. I know of no one paying 3k per month. Usually it’s between 1k-1.5k, which completely changes this graph.
Please tell me where anyone is paying 1k-1.5k for an apartment in NYC. I am paying 2700/mo for 650 sqft, 45 minute commute from midtown, and I haven't seen anything better without a longer commute. Studios in my neighborhood are 1.6k+, and I am not in a happenin' place.
Re: Tech takes over: New York is the sector's second city
#186Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you have any idea how big Brooklyn is?
Since this comment is attempting to be pedantic, I'll give you a pedantic answer: Yes I have access to google maps just like the rest of the world. Serious answer: Yes, the landmass that constitutes Brooklyn is large . The landscape of the main neighborhoods that have gentrified over the years are not so big. If you actually live there you know which parts I am talking about.
What are you talking about? By area, Brooklyn is more gentrified than not-gentrified.
Re: Tech takes over: New York is the sector's second city
#187"official" FTEs is one way to slice it, but kind of dumb. Seattle is home to two of the five biggest tech companies in the US. Boston has had an IPO every year for the last ten years that exceeds any in NYC history. LA has had the only 11-digit IPO in the last five years, outside of the bay area. It's also capturing the zeitgeist in a way that NYC no longer does (that's subjective, of course, but I'd debate it). Just…
1. Atlassian 2. Canva? 3. ??
I can’t think of anything else big and “impressive”. Who am I forgetting?
Re: Tech takes over: New York is the sector's second city
#188Earlier quoted context omitted.
Having lived in both SOMA and the Mission, I wholeheartedly disagree. The vast majority of people I met at coffee shops, restaurants or bars in the city worked in tech. Living in Manhattan (East Village) and Brooklyn provided a completely different experience. It was a rare to meet people who work in tech. In both circumstances, I haven't been going out of my way to try to meet people in any specific industry.
> Having lived in both SOMA and the Mission, I wholeheartedly disagree. No need to rely on anecdotes though. According to San Francisco’s Controller’s Office, a little over 6% of the population work in the tech industry[1]. That is an unquestionably small minority of the overall population. If the people you have met predominantly worked in tech, it is likely due to a bubble you created yourself. Perhaps, for example…
Close to a third of jobs in one region being in tech is an insanely high number, and it's no wonder that people would feel that the Bay Area is lacking diversity.
https://web.archive.org/web/20130308072135/http://www.bayare...
Re: Tech takes over: New York is the sector's second city
#189What is Boston doing wrong? In the 80s thanks to the 128 Tech Row, it was on par with Silicon Valley as the top spot, then it lost ground and now NYC is considered #2? We have the highest concentration of collegiate tech talent, the same weather as NYC (obviously worse than SV), lower cost of living than both cities, and there's been a ton of investment in real estate for tech companies in the Seaport District. Too l…
Culturally speaking, why does Boston's nightlife end so early in the evening?
Re: Tech takes over: New York is the sector's second city
#190The article says, "tech companies -- defined as those whose principal business is tech and its applications" but then their examples are companies that are largely shops. There's nothing wrong with shops(!!) but these people aren't developing any technology, and aren't really taking advantage of new technology any more tahn (and probably less than) Target, Wal-mart or McDonald's. Perhaps a better way to put it is we call UAL, AA, etc "airlines" rather than "aircraft companies". We don't call comcast, or sprint "tech" companies even though they have a lot of engineers on their staff.
In one sense, who cares? If these companies are successful and good for their customers, employees and investors that's great.
(of course to me Cummins engines and 3M are pretty high tech businesses too, even if little computation or electronics is discussed by them).
But I am quite interested in tech businesses and products, and this all seems a bit weird.