Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I have no idea how a teacher would be able to live in SV and plan to have a family and everything else. The math teacher at my high school in Santa Cruz was a retired electrical engineer with a Ph.D. from Stanford. There's no rule that says teachers need to make a living from teaching. It's known for being pleasant work. Granted, the school hasn't pursued that strategy since then...
Every job we as a society want done should pay a living wage. Teaching children definitely is one of them.
Mountain View approves 10,000 homes by Google's North Bayshore project (2017)
211–215 of 215 posts
Re: Mountain View approves 10,000 homes by Google's North Bayshore project (2017)
#212Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I have no idea how a teacher would be able to live in SV and plan to have a family and everything else. The math teacher at my high school in Santa Cruz was a retired electrical engineer with a Ph.D. from Stanford. There's no rule that says teachers need to make a living from teaching. It's known for being pleasant work. Granted, the school hasn't pursued that strategy since then...
Every job we as a society want done should pay a living wage. Teaching children definitely is one of them.
To be noted though, it's a specific Master's degree that's required to be a fully qualified teacher.
Re: Mountain View approves 10,000 homes by Google's North Bayshore project (2017)
#213Earlier quoted context omitted.
Agreed, but >There would also be kids, who need to be transported to schools. We should be building neighborhoods such that kids can walk to school. Even my single-family-home dominated 2.5 square mile "village" could manage that.
Yeah, 10k homes is more than enough to support a school of it's own. They shouldn't need to be bused anywhere until middle or high school.
Re: Mountain View approves 10,000 homes by Google's North Bayshore project (2017)
#214Earlier quoted context omitted.
The more I dig into this, the less I realize I know. I asked, "did the slums exist before the highways and freeways that divide them from the wealthy whites?" The best I've come up with is "Sort of." Apparently, in the 50's and 60s, city officials throughout the US thought of urban freeways as "a good opportunity to get rid of the local 'niggertown.'"[1] But that attempt at clearing the local slums ended up further d…
The Guardian published a good story on this just today: https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2018/feb/21/roads-nowhere...
That was before the Cypress freeway tore West Oakland in two, or 980 sheared it away from downtown Oakland, or the trans-bay BART tracks, or before the USPS distribution center was built. The last, for those not familiar, is a 6 story concrete windowless menace that I've started calling the "Ministry of Truth."
Slums exist because the privileged spent a century paving over neighborhoods filled with people that they wished would just stop existing.