Earlier quoted context omitted.
> uniquely low; it is rivaled only by physics and MechE for gender disparity. So it is not, in fact, "uniquely" low. It is about the same as other engineering. Hmm...maybe because it is like other engineering? > Whatever is keeping women to 20% of our field is artificial, and a travesty. You claim without a shred of evidence, while poo-pooing the actual evidence to the contrary. It is a simple fact that most people r…
https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2014/10/21/357629765/when... I mean, it looks like an artificial phenomenon.
http://gender.stanford.edu/news/2011/researcher-reveals-how-...
> Rather, managers hired women because they expected programming to be a low-skill clerical function, akin to filing, typing, or telephone switching. Assuming that the real “brain work” in electronic computing would be limited to the hardware side, managers reserved these tasks for male engineers.