Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The value of c is specific to the medium. c is the speed of light in vacuum, a universal constant that obviously doesn't depend on the medium.
Sometimes people write c with subscripts, so I've seen the notation he's using before. It sounds reasonable enough to me. Edit: To be specific, in this context c was used for the speed of light in the medium and c_0 for the speed of light in vacuum. (To match epsilon and epsilon_0).
Edit: yes, I know. But using c in that way is absolutely non-standard in physics (v is used instead). Actually he later used c* for the speed of light in a medium, so he knows what c is.