Live data from Hacker News

Reasons to think that, in terms of influence if not wealth, Facebook has peaked

bbc.co.uk

1–10 of 114 posts

Re: Reasons to think that, in terms of influence if not wealth, Facebook has peaked

#4
I'm not sure if this article can support a substantive discussion or not, but thought it might be worth the trick of taking a more complex phrase for the title in the hope of stimulating more substantive responses. HN threads are often like those psych tests that measure complexity of response by time delay.

It's a bit weird, but there's some reason to believe that just the small tax it imposes on the brain to parse a complex title may slow it down enough to discourage pure reflex in reaction. Reflective, not reflexive, reactions are what we're going for here.

Re: Reasons to think that, in terms of influence if not wealth, Facebook has peaked

#9
I mean Facebook has arguably reached all the audience it could reach.

The only way they could keep growing is the increase time spent on their platform. That said Id conjecture the optimization towards short term reward cycles (more clickbaity articles being recommended, etc.) loses customer loyalty over the long run

Post reply on HN