Prince Rupert's cube
en.wikipedia.org
Prince Rupert's cube
1–10 of 43 posts
Re: Prince Rupert's cube
#2Interesting that the optimal solution is not "slide it along the space diagonal" but rather "slide it parallel to a face".
Re: Prince Rupert's cube
#3Interesting that the optimal solution is not "slide it along the space diagonal" but rather "slide it parallel to a face".
I might be wrong about this, but as far as I can see the larger cube slides parallel to an edge and not a face. On top of that, I think the cube passing through would still be sliding parallel to an edge, even if it were to slide along a space diagonal, so those two wouldn't be mutually exclusive. Unless I have failed to visualize it right ok my head.
Re: Prince Rupert's cube
#4Another interesting thing named after Prince Rupert is the Prince Rupert's drop for anyone interested:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5MORochIDw
Re: Prince Rupert's cube
#5A video is worth a thousand words of theory:
Re: Prince Rupert's cube
#6A video is worth a thousand words of theory: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2jjgHsxEu4
That was very good (thank you!), but it led me to this, which was even better:
Re: Prince Rupert's cube
#7I reckon you could stretch this to a 30 minute whiteboard session to answer why (some) manhole covers are round.
Re: Prince Rupert's cube
#8looks like a fun model to 3d-print
Re: Prince Rupert's cube
#9Another interesting thing named after Prince Rupert is the Prince Rupert's drop for anyone interested: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5MORochIDw
I recommend trying them with capillary tubes, you can melt them with a cigarette lighter
Re: Prince Rupert's cube
#10A video is worth a thousand words of theory: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2jjgHsxEu4
After watching the video, I feel like this follows intuitively from the fact that sqrt(2) > 1.