Earlier quoted context omitted.
All true, but the Eternal September for me came when I lost control of my feed to arbitrary ML algorithms attempting to maximize shareholder value whilst alienating the fewest users. I think someone could recreate early FB on the blockchain and take a huge chunk of interesting people off of the two current awful choices. Because I do remember the time when it was fun to reconnect with people and follow their lives th…
> I think someone could recreate early FB on the blockchain wtf does this mean? I'm asking only because this sounds exactly as loaded and buzzwordy as "I lost control of my feed to arbitrary ML algorithms attempting to maximize shareholder value whilst alienating the fewest users" you've just gone the opposite direction with the hyperbole.
Facebook lost around 2.8M U.S. users under 25 last year
281–290 of 365 posts
Re: Facebook lost around 2.8M U.S. users under 25 last year
#282I signed up for Facebook recently after deleting my account 9 years ago. I was banned within 30 minutes after updating my work history and a profile photo. Submitted an appeal with my drivers license and passport. Unbanned in a couple hours. Kept building my profile over the next couple days and was banned 3 more times. Submitted appeals each time with all the requested information. Nothing malicious, political, or s…
Sounds like facebook has a pretty effective scam for getting people to give them driver's licenses, passports and untold other treasure troves of personal information.
Re: Facebook lost around 2.8M U.S. users under 25 last year
#283Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I don't yet have that feeling about snapchat, though the new design is annoying. I tried to try it out but even on a Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 when it came out it was unbearably slow and even not using the camera drained the battery (IIRC it is/was because Snapchat kept the camera on during the time the app was open in order to avoid the 1-2s lag of camera setup). I can't understand why and how kids and young people lik…
>I can't understand why and how kids and young people like it so much. That. That right there is why they like it so much. Because you're not on it. Their parents and grandparents are on Facebook, but those parents and grandparents can't figure out how to use Snapchat or don't see why kids like it, and that is exactly why kids like it. It's the "adults can't see why kids love Cinnamon Toast Crunch" or "Trix is for ki…
Re: Facebook lost around 2.8M U.S. users under 25 last year
#284Earlier quoted context omitted.
All true, but the Eternal September for me came when I lost control of my feed to arbitrary ML algorithms attempting to maximize shareholder value whilst alienating the fewest users. I think someone could recreate early FB on the blockchain and take a huge chunk of interesting people off of the two current awful choices. Because I do remember the time when it was fun to reconnect with people and follow their lives th…
on the blockchain Why? Everything else you wrote makes sense to me except for this.
Shysters gotta shyst. After all, somebody has to buy those heavy bags...
Re: Facebook lost around 2.8M U.S. users under 25 last year
#285Whenever I see a post like this on HN, I see the inevitable "the product sucks" posts in the comments. As an engineer and social media user, I completely agree, but it doesn't seem to be bearing out in the marketplace. Facebook continues to grow[0] (if more slowly). So what is the HN audience to Facebook? Our we taste makers? A demographic ahead of the product curve, predictive of Facebook's imminent decline? Or are…
Re: Facebook lost around 2.8M U.S. users under 25 last year
#286Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Look beyond those selective statistics, FB.com is dead. That's a bit of a strange conclusion when their financials show increasing revenue and increasing profit, quarter over quarter and year over year. From 2016 to 2017 their revenue grew almost 50% as did their Net Income[0]. It's not all roses of course, but it's hardly dead. [0] https://finance.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AFB&fstype=ii&a...
They are squeezing every last drop out of their userbase, but the numbers do not lie. Decreasing DAU/MAU in their most profitable demographics means that their revenue numbers will eventually suffer.
Re: Facebook lost around 2.8M U.S. users under 25 last year
#287Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I think someone could recreate early FB on the blockchain wtf does this mean? I'm asking only because this sounds exactly as loaded and buzzwordy as "I lost control of my feed to arbitrary ML algorithms attempting to maximize shareholder value whilst alienating the fewest users" you've just gone the opposite direction with the hyperbole.
It means I would like "liking" a post of grumpy cat to use as much energy as a Toyota Carola driving from Miami to Washington DC. Luckily, actually posting grumpy cat photos causes brownouts, so there are none to like.
Re: Facebook lost around 2.8M U.S. users under 25 last year
#288Earlier quoted context omitted.
Instagram is so frustrating. I want to see all the stuff in my feed but they actively make it hard to do so. All I want is a complete chronological feed of media. No terrible sorting algo, no held back stuff to show me later, no suggestions.
I don't know why Snapchat, Instagram, Facebook, etc can't have a simple toggle between chronological and the default algorithmic feed... I've seen everyone complain about this for years online and it seems like such a simple problem to solve. Much like searching for Tweets, Twitter provides a "New" vs "Top" filter which does that same... It has nothing to do with advertising as both views can include ads.