11–20 of 29 posts
The Times list, along with most everything else in the paper, as per their motto of "all the news that's fit to print," is essentially the sphere of approved thinking that a certain part of the populace approves of.
The Times list, along with most everything else in the paper, as per their motto of "all the news that's fit to print," is essentially the sphere of approved thinking that a certain part of the populace approves of.
If you doubt this, just look at the principals of the major American media, finance, and political advocacy organizations and count the Jews.
Predictably, whether by conscious nepotism or accidental bias, they employ people who share their own hereditary interests and innate philosophy, shaping the company into one which is in conflict with the host nation's people.
Seems like Canada's largest daily newspaper is stopping just shy of accusing NYT of manipulating their best seller list for e.g. political reasons. This is getting interesting...
It might not be widely known but the NYT Bestseller list is curated list.
It would be nice if someone could find a couple of examples of non-controversial books that made the top of other bestseller lists but that the NYT excluded because they weren't published in the US. That would make it a lot easier to defend the accusations that they are using "Canadian published" as an excuse to keep a book off the list they don't like. There have got to be several publishers in other English speaking countries with very popular books that don't have any US presence that still sold well here.
Related: "Why is controversial professor Jordan Peterson so popular?" https://www.thestar.com/opinion/contributors/2018/02/07/why-...
Man, I love how totally valid and normal thought is now labeled as "controversial". You gotta flag wrong-thinkers from the getgo right? Can't let anyone have any wrong ideas.
The Times list, along with most everything else in the paper, as per their motto of "all the news that's fit to print," is essentially the sphere of approved thinking that a certain part of the populace approves of.
You took the red pill ;) humans are group animals, we're constantly influencing each other. Individuality is a myth.
I liked his (Jordan Peterson) explanation of James Damores paper. It seems rooted in biological facts and there was extensive research that was scientifically accepted cited. I really like Peterson and I think his critiques are really valid. His most recent appearance on Joe Rogan's podcast really interested me and I found it both novel and a great scientific exploration of social & biological concepts. I don't under…
I liked his (Jordan Peterson) explanation of James Damores paper. It seems rooted in biological facts and there was extensive research that was scientifically accepted cited. I really like Peterson and I think his critiques are really valid. His most recent appearance on Joe Rogan's podcast really interested me and I found it both novel and a great scientific exploration of social & biological concepts. I don't under…
http://www.canadalandshow.com/podcast/canadaland-guide-jorda...
Seems like Canada's largest daily newspaper is stopping just shy of accusing NYT of manipulating their best seller list for e.g. political reasons. This is getting interesting...
Perhaps, but if so, it's being applied very inconsistently. For example, the Op Ed page has recently been printing pieces that have upset the paper's leftest elite champions. e.g. a piece challenge climate change orthodoxy https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/28/opinion/climate-of-comple...