I'm the author of the blog post. Thanks for posting! I can answer any questions you have about the IOTA review or other shitcoin reviews.
Great blog idea. I really enjoy how you are reviewing the hands-on user experience of working with a coin and chain.
IOTA: Cannot be used for IoT, loss of funds may occur
11–20 of 109 posts
Re: IOTA: Cannot be used for IoT, loss of funds may occur
#12Earlier quoted context omitted.
I love learning about cryptocurrencies through shitcoins. It helps keeping perspective in check. Keep up the great work.
Thanks! If you have a shitcoin you want me to review, I'm open to suggestions.
The company claims that 100s of banks and financial institutes are using their technology, but ALL 100+ institutions are only evaluating / doing pilots.
Company has been around since 2011, I am very curious why there isn't a single big name that has put it's weight behind this for real production use.
Re: IOTA: Cannot be used for IoT, loss of funds may occur
#13I then tried to build from source. I'm doing some Node development so I have Node v8.x installed (the current LTS version). Turns out the wallet requires Node v6.
At that point I gave up. I also read that Cardano has some great concepts but right now it's still in its first, centralized phase.
Re: IOTA: Cannot be used for IoT, loss of funds may occur
#14Of course it's not meant for IoT. It's written in Java, has the whole ternary nonsense going, and uses custom crypto, which would be really slow to implement, compared to hardware-accelerated RSA or AES most cheap embedded chips have nowadays. I, for one, am excited for the moment a cryptocurrency arrives that is actually usable for its supposed use. Every time someone claims to be a cryptocurrency for X (be it file…
There's a few I follow (VeChain, Monero, Nano, GET) but like you I find it quite hard to imagine more than a handful that could realistically achieve the aim(s) they've set out to do.
Re: IOTA: Cannot be used for IoT, loss of funds may occur
#15I'm the author of the blog post. Thanks for posting! I can answer any questions you have about the IOTA review or other shitcoin reviews.
Someone posted this 'rebuff' to your blog post on reddit.
https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/7we3x0/rebu...
Direct link: https://medium.com/@ralf/andreas-brekken-proves-he-has-no-cl...
Re: IOTA: Cannot be used for IoT, loss of funds may occur
#16Great article. I chuckled quite a bit. This reminds me of my attempts to check out Cardano. There was no working Linux client. (I checked again today: Still no Linux client. The latest release of the software appears to be from September 2017). I then tried to build from source. I'm doing some Node development so I have Node v8.x installed (the current LTS version). Turns out the wallet requires Node v6. At that poin…
Yikes.
Re: IOTA: Cannot be used for IoT, loss of funds may occur
#17Re: IOTA: Cannot be used for IoT, loss of funds may occur
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thanks! If you have a shitcoin you want me to review, I'm open to suggestions.
Don't know if it's a shitcoin, but can you review XRP / Ripple? The company claims that 100s of banks and financial institutes are using their technology, but ALL 100+ institutions are only evaluating / doing pilots. Company has been around since 2011, I am very curious why there isn't a single big name that has put it's weight behind this for real production use.
Re: IOTA: Cannot be used for IoT, loss of funds may occur
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thanks! If you have a shitcoin you want me to review, I'm open to suggestions.
Don't know if it's a shitcoin, but can you review XRP / Ripple? The company claims that 100s of banks and financial institutes are using their technology, but ALL 100+ institutions are only evaluating / doing pilots. Company has been around since 2011, I am very curious why there isn't a single big name that has put it's weight behind this for real production use.
Re: IOTA: Cannot be used for IoT, loss of funds may occur
#20For anyone interested, there's been a response to this article by Ralf Rottmann: https://medium.com/@ralf/andreas-brekken-proves-he-has-no-cl...