RabbitMQ 2.0 is out includes paging messages on disk and support for AMQP 0-9-1
1–8 of 8 posts
Re: RabbitMQ 2.0 is out includes paging messages on disk and support for AMQP 0-9-1
#2More details here: http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-announce/2010-A...
The new persister is going to help a LOT of people. Check it out!
Re: RabbitMQ 2.0 is out includes paging messages on disk and support for AMQP 0-9-1
#3Full release notes: http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-announce/attach...
Re: RabbitMQ 2.0 is out includes paging messages on disk and support for AMQP 0-9-1
#4now only if it cooperated with STOMP better
Re: RabbitMQ 2.0 is out includes paging messages on disk and support for AMQP 0-9-1
#5More details here: http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-announce/2010-A... The new persister is going to help a LOT of people. Check it out!
Thank you so much! I have been waiting on this for months now, and I can't believe it's finally here!
Re: RabbitMQ 2.0 is out includes paging messages on disk and support for AMQP 0-9-1
#6RabbitMQ rocks, I've recently written a small tutorial on using their rabbitmq erlang client: http://developingthedream.blogspot.com/2010/08/setting-up-qu...
Re: RabbitMQ 2.0 is out includes paging messages on disk and support for AMQP 0-9-1
#7now only if it cooperated with STOMP better
Hmm, that might be fun to hack on...
One problem will be that AMQp is much more complicated than Stomp, and exposes a set of primitives for which there is no good analogue in Stomp -- notably bindings and queues as first class, client manipulable, items.
It should be possible to choose some reasonable behavior though and go with it. Ah, where is my copious free time!?
Re: RabbitMQ 2.0 is out includes paging messages on disk and support for AMQP 0-9-1
#8Didn't a recent article on Varnish vs. Squid show that letting the kernel handle paging was a better method? Or is this not related?