Disclaimer: Freakonomics to me embodies modern business writing at its worst. Anecdotal, single case half-correlations that try to pretend they’re something more than fluff entertainment. In this article, they truly don’t disappoint. A hilarious and misguided glorification of what, I imagine, is a soul crushing business for 99/100 prostitutes. Written like a recruiting pamphlet, to boot. And the answer to how a prost…
is a soul crushing business for 99/100 prostitutes How is that conclusion much better than the one you're attacking?
Me vs. Professor of Economics Steven Levitt:
Levitt:
1 hand-picked prostitue that was a guest lecturer in his college class.
Me:
- PROSTITUTION IS THE MOST DANGEROUS JOB IN AMERICA. The murder rate is 1 in 490. Compare that to the fishing industry, where the death rate is 1 in 775.
- Eighty-two percent of prostitutes reported having been physically assaulted since entering prostitution.
- Women trafficked to the United States have been forced to have sex with 400-500 men to pay off $40,000 in debt for their passage.
- Statistics show that at least 2/3 of prostitutes began working in prostitution before the age of 16
Like Levitt I decided to provide points that suit my argument.
Sources are from top 3 results in Google for "prostitution statistics":
http://www.bayswan.org/stats.html
http://kiss951.radio.com/2010/04/29/seven-statistics-about-p...
http://womensissues.about.com/od/rapesexualassault/a/Wuornos...