Live data from Hacker News

Snap Revenue Surges 72% on User Growth, Advertising Gains

bloomberg.com

1–10 of 148 posts

Re: Snap Revenue Surges 72% on User Growth, Advertising Gains

#4
Snap users and advertisers have responded very positively to the clear division between user generated content and advertising. If you are not a Snap user, or if you haven't used it in awhile, I encourage you to check it out.

Snap advertisers are mostly lifestyle brands that want to engage with their users in a new way. Tacobell isn't advertising on Snap, but Popular Mechanics is. When a user clicks on Popular Mechanics they have confidence it's because a user wants to engage with them, and Popular Mechanics hopes this closer relationship has benefits outside of the Snapchat app. A user choosing to give you their attention is a _very_ valuable thing. Most other social media advertisements are missing this part.

Re: Snap Revenue Surges 72% on User Growth, Advertising Gains

#5
post #2

A loss of $3.45 Billion for the year - that is absolutely mind blowing. That is a net loss of USD $393,000 per hour for every hour of 2017.

Eh, it was all booked in 2017. But almost $2 billion of this loss actually accrued over many years as stock options compensation.

Re: Snap Revenue Surges 72% on User Growth, Advertising Gains

#7
post #4

Snap users and advertisers have responded very positively to the clear division between user generated content and advertising. If you are not a Snap user, or if you haven't used it in awhile, I encourage you to check it out. Snap advertisers are mostly lifestyle brands that want to engage with their users in a new way. Tacobell isn't advertising on Snap, but Popular Mechanics is. When a user clicks on Popular Mechan…

Just wondering why you say Tacobell isnt advertising on Snap? They were part of a very publicized campaign a couple years ago [1], are you saying they've stopped?

[1] https://www.marketingdive.com/news/taco-bells-cinco-de-mayo-...

Re: Snap Revenue Surges 72% on User Growth, Advertising Gains

#8
post #2

A loss of $3.45 Billion for the year - that is absolutely mind blowing. That is a net loss of USD $393,000 per hour for every hour of 2017.

Like other people have mentioned, this is mainly stock compensation related, but the funniest part is that they tag this loss % as "Not meaningful" in their financial statements. Just a not meaningful $2B loss :)

Re: Snap Revenue Surges 72% on User Growth, Advertising Gains

#9
post #2

A loss of $3.45 Billion for the year - that is absolutely mind blowing. That is a net loss of USD $393,000 per hour for every hour of 2017.

Companies don't die when they lose money. They cut expenses or they get acquired. Companies die when they have no revenue. If I were an investor in Snap I would much rather see them raise revenue then cut expenses or decrease loses. Their loses are considered in the stock price.

Re: Snap Revenue Surges 72% on User Growth, Advertising Gains

#10
post #4

Snap users and advertisers have responded very positively to the clear division between user generated content and advertising. If you are not a Snap user, or if you haven't used it in awhile, I encourage you to check it out. Snap advertisers are mostly lifestyle brands that want to engage with their users in a new way. Tacobell isn't advertising on Snap, but Popular Mechanics is. When a user clicks on Popular Mechan…

Just wondering why you say Tacobell isnt advertising on Snap? They were part of a very publicized campaign a couple years ago [1], are you saying they've stopped? [1] https://www.marketingdive.com/news/taco-bells-cinco-de-mayo-...

I meant it as an example of most people advertising of Snapchat don't sell things but are lifestyle brands.

I should not have used that example.

Post reply on HN