Live data from Hacker News

SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy successfully launches

techcrunch.com

291–300 of 926 posts

Re: SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy successfully launches

#291

There was something doubly awesome about the two falcons landing at the same time right next to each other!

It was almost a brain stack-overflow for me. I made a weird, bleating laugh noise and tried to open my eyes wider than design spec. A sincerely surprising and amazing sight.

[deleted]

Re: SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy successfully launches

#292
post #242

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Does anyone know how long a book (paper) would last in space?

Why wouldn't it last functionally forever? It's now in vacuum, and eventually will get to whatever temperature the sun can bake it to at that distance from the sun... I'm guessing it'll be there as long as the car is.

I'd guess that the temperature fluctuations and radiation would be pretty hard on paper. Zero humidity would probably make it brittle as well.

Re: SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy successfully launches

#293
post #192

Love that SpaceX’s own team shoots, announces, and switches the live production in-house rather than hiring a production company. Also love seeing machinists side by side cheering with software engineers, standing by a mission control which is placed feet from where engines are assembled on the shop floor. Open company culture well-executed. Congratulations to all there!

This is why I love the live streams hosted by John Innsprucker. He doesn't look like a TV star, he looks like an engineer, a rocket scientist. He looks real. The other hosts are great, but if you told me they were hired actors or PR people I'd believe it.

> The other hosts are great, but if you told me they were hired actors or PR people I'd believe it.

Because they are young and good looking and good at public speaking?

Re: SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy successfully launches

#294

USA Today reports the center stage landed "The core stage, meanwhile, burned slightly longer before separating from the upper stage, performed a flip maneuver and landed on SpaceX's Of Course I Still Love You drone ship." Not sure it's true. https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/nation-now/2018/02/06/sp...

[deleted]

Re: SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy successfully launches

#295
post #58

Elon over there landing rockets on drone ships, I'm over here finishing a new photo app. Elon over there going to Mars, I can't even get this dang app to build. Might be time to move.... http://www.spacex.com/careers

But even to be a dishwasher, which I wouldn't mind: >To conform to U.S. Government space technology export regulations, applicant must be a U.S. citizen, lawful permanent resident of the U.S., protected individual as defined by 8 U.S.C. 1324b(a)(3), or eligible to obtain the required authorizations from the U.S. Department of State. I mean, I understand, but it still puts a damper on the "Team Humanity" vibe. :/ Same…

Consider that the SpaceX team can simultaneously be team USA and team humanity. They are after all exactly that.

People outside the US want to feel part of the accomplishment, which is understandable as there are only a few nations that are likely to ever have the resources to do something like this. So the USA cheering feels exclusionary, naturally. I chalk it up to them being proud of the immense work they've done to get the US back into space properly again.

Re: SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy successfully launches

#296

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Musk has said there is no reason they can't attach two more in the future.

That would be simply Kerbal.

Honestly it’s amazing how much better I understand this and other space stuff I’ve seen in the last year or two (like shows about Apollo, etc) since playing KSP.

No better way to learn basic orbital dynamics out there.

Re: SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy successfully launches

#297
post #171

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Lost, or lost video feed?

There's been word from unofficial but reliable sources that it came in 'too hot' and died on impact.

That's unfortunate if so. You'd have thought there would have been plenty of extra fuel to obviate the need for a hard landing, given that the actual Roadster payload is a small fraction of the rocket's capability. This wasn't a mission where they were stretching fuel to make the landing, like they have with some of the marginal Falcon 9 launches in the past where the payload size was just at max for the vehicle.

Re: SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy successfully launches

#298

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s like that at BlueOrigin too. I visited twice (they gave me a job offer but withdrew it after I got badmouthed by a reference, gah). They have an avionics software engineering room right next to where they assemble the engines.

> they gave me a job offer but withdrew it after I got badmouthed by a reference Why in the world would someone agree to be a reference and then bad mouth afterwards? Some folks...

maybe he just put him down as a reference and never asked or gave him a heads up in advance? Or rather why would anyone put down a reference that isn't going to put in a good word for them?
Post reply on HN