Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's all written in C++, so from a security and reliability perspective, I'm sketical it's going to offer much improvement over Linux. I don't see any evidence yet of "new technology". I'm happy to be proven wrong.
> It's all written in C++, so from a security and reliability perspective, I'm sketical it's going to offer much improvement over Linux. Are you an expert in C? or in C++?
Google’s Fuchsia OS on the Pixelbook
91–100 of 126 posts
Re: Google’s Fuchsia OS on the Pixelbook
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's all written in C++, so from a security and reliability perspective, I'm sketical it's going to offer much improvement over Linux. I don't see any evidence yet of "new technology". I'm happy to be proven wrong.
I can use your logic to prove that there is no evidence of new technology in the Falcon 9 rocket. After all, it is developed with very similar tools compared to every other rocket in existence.
However, it is true that many high profile failures in aerospace have been due to software errors, so I would say that software tooling is certainly one area that they could also benefit from.
Re: Google’s Fuchsia OS on the Pixelbook
#93Earlier quoted context omitted.
> It's all written in C++, so from a security and reliability perspective, I'm sketical it's going to offer much improvement over Linux. Are you an expert in C? or in C++?
It's not news to anyone that C/C++ puts the burden of security and safety onto the programmer. And it's getting harder all the time, see for example Spectre mitigation. C was designed alongside Unix in the 70's, a very different era. It is time for a next generation OS, but it needs to be built using next generation tooling.
Okay, so neither.
Please consider reading these links. [1] [2]
Re: Google’s Fuchsia OS on the Pixelbook
#94Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not news to anyone that C/C++ puts the burden of security and safety onto the programmer. And it's getting harder all the time, see for example Spectre mitigation. C was designed alongside Unix in the 70's, a very different era. It is time for a next generation OS, but it needs to be built using next generation tooling.
> It is not news to anyone that C/C++ puts the burden of security and safety onto the programmer. Okay, so neither. Please consider reading these links. [1] [2] [1] http://qr.ae/TbSNZ8 [2] http://www.lb-stuff.com/cc
Re: Google’s Fuchsia OS on the Pixelbook
#95The code is available here: https://fuchsia.googlesource.com/ Key components: ## Zircon Zircon is the operating system's foundation: it mediates hardware access, implements essential software abstractions over shared resources, and provides a platform for low-level software development. For example, Zircon contains the kernel, device manager, most core and first-party device drivers, and low-level system libraries, s…
Re: Google’s Fuchsia OS on the Pixelbook
#96Earlier quoted context omitted.
As somebody who read that famous first email and shared it around her lab: We were all tremendously excited, and spent days discussing it. This is the same thing - it's exciting . It's trying to do things many of us have thought of, but never worked on. It's new technology. It's something that, in our hearts, we want to succeed just because the alternatives are all grungy and dusty and carry the compatibility fixes o…
It's all written in C++, so from a security and reliability perspective, I'm sketical it's going to offer much improvement over Linux. I don't see any evidence yet of "new technology". I'm happy to be proven wrong.
Re: Google’s Fuchsia OS on the Pixelbook
#97Earlier quoted context omitted.
I can use your logic to prove that there is no evidence of new technology in the Falcon 9 rocket. After all, it is developed with very similar tools compared to every other rocket in existence.
Assuming your analogy has merit, I doubt very much this is true. Computer modelling, for example, has improved significantly over the years. However, it is true that many high profile failures in aerospace have been due to software errors, so I would say that software tooling is certainly one area that they could also benefit from.
Re: Google’s Fuchsia OS on the Pixelbook
#98There's no point to these early Fuschia review attempts. I don't see how it demonstrates anything. It's like looking at the famous first email from Linus Torvald and figuring out what the os would be in the end. So it boots, it has windows, but not apps, and prints some things to the screen. It tells us nothing about real intentions, future capabilities, etc.
Its sort of a "review" of an early preview. I think it demonstrates a lot especially what Fuchsia is and what it is capable of. The other point would be that Google gets free advertisements of their new OS.
Maybe it's a subtle signal of their plans/capabilities towards competitors/dart devs?
Re: Google’s Fuchsia OS on the Pixelbook
#99Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are already important signals here. 1. Your login is tied to your google account. Want to use the computer in any real capacity? Google account. 2. They think bringing back multi tasking from the 90s is important. 3. People will want to control their computer views. 4. They are making a new kernel. 5. They believe in the capabilities based security model. 6. They believe in micro kernels. 7. They don't have any…
I feel like just executing an old idea correctly is as worthwhile as coming up with something new.
Re: Google’s Fuchsia OS on the Pixelbook
#100There's no point to these early Fuschia review attempts. I don't see how it demonstrates anything. It's like looking at the famous first email from Linus Torvald and figuring out what the os would be in the end. So it boots, it has windows, but not apps, and prints some things to the screen. It tells us nothing about real intentions, future capabilities, etc.
I'm hoping it will be noticed by Linus and other Linux developers and help them address some of the shortcomings that Fuchsia aims to fix. It seems like this is how Google is exerting pressure on Linux to get what it wants...
I don't think they're trying to push Linux anywhere.
Maybe they're trying to win over users from Linux, giving them some power in the software market & free contributions.