Earlier quoted context omitted.
Eggs = unborn baby birds.
Not unless they're fertilised.
Whoops.
61–70 of 181 posts
K sooo to (kinda) answer the question: depends. What's your definition of consciousness? Now as for the implication that anesthetics sedating plants has ANYTHING to do with this/whether or not they are conscious: no. No sorry, not buying it. Need more science. This just suggests we may have similar inhibitory biochemical responses to certain organic compounds. That's not surprising since were all made out of hydrocar…
> What's your definition of consciousness? How about - ability to adapt to environment and select good actions depending on situation, learning from reward/loss signals.
Consciousness, like Artificial Intelligence, is a slippery concept. They both tend toward being unattainable by anything-other-than-human:
i. As we implement progressively more abstract concepts in computers, those layers of abstraction become mundane things that computers can do.
ii. As we learn more and more about how non-robot-like other organisms are we can quite easily push consciousness further in to the human-only corner by just adjusting the definition of consciousness.
Insofar as consciousness can be defined as the state of being aware of and responsive to one's surroundings the yes, plants certainly are conscious.*
Do they posses self-awareness?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> What's your definition of consciousness? How about - ability to adapt to environment and select good actions depending on situation, learning from reward/loss signals.
Ooh, a new one. I need to start collecting these. There's just such incredible variety.
The dictionary I have close at hand claims:
consciousness |ˈkɒnʃəsnɪs|
noun
1 [ mass noun ] the state of being aware of and responsive to one's surroundings: she failed to regain consciousness and died two days later.
2 a person's awareness or perception of something: her acute consciousness of Luke's presence.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would argue that there are lots of valid reasons to eat lower on the food chain, many of which can be framed as having a moral impetus. But the idea that it is morally superior based on plants being stupid is repugnant to me. It opens the door on questions like "So, is it okay to eat mentally retarded people?" Some moral arguments I can agree with: A mostly plant based diet is less resource intensive. Since most wa…
>There are health benefits to eating less meat. Are there? To what extent? I'd very much like to see the science to back up a blanket statement like that.
All the information in the world is but a google search away...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> What's your definition of consciousness? How about - ability to adapt to environment and select good actions depending on situation, learning from reward/loss signals.
So a Roomba is conscious?
That seems closer to the everyday definition of consciousness most people operate by, than to the hopelessly bikeshed attempts at making it a uniquely human thing.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
If IQ measured the depth of emotional understanding, then yes. You don't have to like it, just find another reason to argue against eating people - there are plenty.
Plenty of very smart people have terrible social and emotional intelligence. So, I don't think so.
> “Plants are not just robotic, stimulus-response devices,” said Frantisek Baluska I don't see how this follows from the finding that sedatives can prevent plants from responding to stimuli. It just means that there's a shared mechanism behind plants' responses and animals' responses, which wouldn't be overly surprising. Of course, that doesn't mean that plants don't have a lot more going on than we usually realise,…
For all I care humans are "just robotic, stimulus-response devices".
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Plenty of very smart people have terrible social and emotional intelligence. So, I don't think so.
It really doesn't matter, because the rationale you provided was essentially: it is wrong because I don't like it. To keep with your utilitarian line of thinking, a position against cannibalism based on disease transmission would make more sense. Personally, I prefer the classic argument of it being the ultimate violation of personal space - but that is likely because I favor Locke's theory of property and the mixing…
To each his own.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ooh, a new one. I need to start collecting these. There's just such incredible variety.
Not particularly new. The dictionary I have close at hand claims: consciousness |ˈkɒnʃəsnɪs| noun 1 [ mass noun ] the state of being aware of and responsive to one's surroundings: she failed to regain consciousness and died two days later. 2 a person's awareness or perception of something: her acute consciousness of Luke's presence.