Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because people aren't robots. That's not how the brain works. People can't concentrate 100% for 8-12 hours a day every day consistently. >What if your supervisor could identify every time you paused to scratch or fidget, and for how long you took a bathroom break? I certainly wouldn't want to work under those conditions.
So the best workers will be people too. No worries; folks won't be judged or measured as robots. Not an issue.
If Workers Slack Off, the Wristband Will Know
41–50 of 88 posts
Re: If Workers Slack Off, the Wristband Will Know
#42I often see debates here about how tech workers should or shouldn’t organize because they’re too highly paid, etc. But what if they organized to protect something more simple, like warehouse workers fundamental humanity? I understand that people have had different experiences working on the tech side of Amazon, some great, some terrible. And yet I would hope that we can all look at this and say “this isn’t something…
Re: If Workers Slack Off, the Wristband Will Know
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are you prepared to wear a bracelet when you work?
Millions of people wear a fitbit. I used to wear a watch (to regulate my work day). How many office workers wear a badge? Most of them. Not a problem
Re: If Workers Slack Off, the Wristband Will Know
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are you prepared to wear a bracelet when you work?
Millions of people wear a fitbit. I used to wear a watch (to regulate my work day). How many office workers wear a badge? Most of them. Not a problem
Re: If Workers Slack Off, the Wristband Will Know
#45As companies develop more ways to ensure consistency of behavior and performance of their human assets, humans need to develop more ways to collectively bargain for their welfare against companies.
Re: If Workers Slack Off, the Wristband Will Know
#46They call this dystopian, but I don't get it. Why keep a slacker around when you have limited slots for workers? Why not measure and retain good workers? Somebody please try a little to see beyond the linkbait title of the OP. Knee-jerk anti-the-man comments aren't very helpful in digging into why this is a good or bad idea.
None of the attacks on your position really answer your question, which I think is a reasonable one. If I'm hiring someone to stack boxes, what's wrong with hiring and keeping the best box stackers? Why should I be limited in the non-discriminatory tools I use to measure such performance? The wristband isn't monitoring an employee's attitude or beliefs. If anything, the tool would make racism or favoritism generally…
Re: If Workers Slack Off, the Wristband Will Know
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because you're monitoring someone constantly. Imagine if your manager sat behind you breathing on your neck while you coded. He has a pack of tic-tacs so his breath is fine. He crushes the tic tacs with his teeth everytime he thinks you're not working
So many, many workers are monitored by human supervisors already. Not shown to be significantly different.
All this does is push people to fight the system more.
Re: If Workers Slack Off, the Wristband Will Know
#48Is it just me or does this sound like they're using the wristbands as a way to build up a better dataset to further optimize their warehouse robots? Externalities notwithstanding, these jobs surely won't exist in the very near future, right?
Re: If Workers Slack Off, the Wristband Will Know
#49As companies develop more ways to ensure consistency of behavior and performance of their human assets, humans need to develop more ways to collectively bargain for their welfare against companies.
Re: If Workers Slack Off, the Wristband Will Know
#50This tracks pretty well with the beginning bit from the Manna short fiction. http://marshallbrain.com/manna1.htm
Next up Alexa headsets with an AI to direct and fire workers.