Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes it's great from a marketer's point of view. From a consumer's point of view, I don't want you to know where I came from. I don't really care if it's useful to you. It's the difference between pleasing marketers vs pleasing users. Firefox chose wisely
Good marketing does please users by delivering them products tailored to them that they may have never knew even existed.
Firefox 59 to strip path information from referrer values for 3rd parties
121–130 of 236 posts
Re: Firefox 59 to strip path information from referrer values for 3rd parties
#122Earlier quoted context omitted.
It might break websites that provide features based on the referrer (eg. a central authentication that redirects back to the original page)
I can't recall ever encountering a referer-based authorization scheme that included the path or querystring in its logic--although it seems likely some goofus has implemented it, somewhere.
Re: Firefox 59 to strip path information from referrer values for 3rd parties
#123Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you have a giant traffic spike, it's nice to know where it came from. Eg. if you get linked on Hacker News, you can go to the thread and engage with potential customers.
Weird, every time I get HN traffic the referrer is the HN homepage, never individual posts. Is it just me?
Re: Firefox 59 to strip path information from referrer values for 3rd parties
#124Earlier quoted context omitted.
If Firefox disabled ads by default, a large number of sites would likely block Firefox or set up angry messages telling the user to switch browsers. Yes, you could bypass that, but most people wouldn't bother. Add in the logistical issues, and the fact that some of the things blocked are beneficial, then I see no reason to expect the conspiracy you suspect.
If a major service blocks Firefox users it could lead to a massive boycott. Users could rally around Mozilla if it stopped selling out their interests. More people use ad-blockers than Firefox has users. The best way to attract more users is to make the best possible browser. That means incorporating ad-blocking as users have loudly demanded for a decade.
... of Firefox.
Most people don't care as much about their browser choice as about the ability to access those major services. I would continue using Firefox, but only because I don't care about most of the popular sites. The majority would switch browsers in a heartbeat.
Re: Firefox 59 to strip path information from referrer values for 3rd parties
#125Earlier quoted context omitted.
As a user I don't want you to know that information. I wish there was a way to click on links with the referer field removed entirely from the request(maybe via context menu)
If you're using Firefox, open 'about:config' and set 'network.http.sendRefererHeader' to 0. http://kb.mozillazine.org/Network.http.sendRefererHeader
Re: Firefox 59 to strip path information from referrer values for 3rd parties
#126Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes it's great from a marketer's point of view. From a consumer's point of view, I don't want you to know where I came from. I don't really care if it's useful to you. It's the difference between pleasing marketers vs pleasing users. Firefox chose wisely
Honestly, I don't think path information is all that useful for marketers.
Re: Firefox 59 to strip path information from referrer values for 3rd parties
#127Re: Firefox 59 to strip path information from referrer values for 3rd parties
#128Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you're using Firefox, open 'about:config' and set 'network.http.sendRefererHeader' to 0. http://kb.mozillazine.org/Network.http.sendRefererHeader
this seems like it turns it off for everyone, not just third parties
"Can one disable the HTTP referrer for only when one is going to a third-party domain?" https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1130505
Re: Firefox 59 to strip path information from referrer values for 3rd parties
#129This one of the reasons I tend to flip completely whenever I see healthcare providers and their suppliers run google analytics tags inside their logged in areas (yes, this really happens). Besides the questionable value of having such tracking inside the logged in areas (it's healthcare, they are not going to worry about their conversion rates) such information should simply never leave the premises. Better still if…