Red Hat to Acquire CoreOS
11–20 of 203 posts
Re: Red Hat to Acquire CoreOS
#12Re: Red Hat to Acquire CoreOS
#13It seems like early 2018 is rife with acquisitions and mergers. Was the recent tax law a factor? Seems like these acquisitions take so much time that it couldn't have been dependent on that. So why all this activity?
New financial year, fresh budgets
Re: Red Hat to Acquire CoreOS
#14It seems like early 2018 is rife with acquisitions and mergers. Was the recent tax law a factor? Seems like these acquisitions take so much time that it couldn't have been dependent on that. So why all this activity?
New financial year, fresh budgets
Re: Red Hat to Acquire CoreOS
#15Re: Red Hat to Acquire CoreOS
#16It seems like early 2018 is rife with acquisitions and mergers. Was the recent tax law a factor? Seems like these acquisitions take so much time that it couldn't have been dependent on that. So why all this activity?
Re: Red Hat to Acquire CoreOS
#17Re: Red Hat to Acquire CoreOS
#18This makes sense. Red Hat has been investing in Project Atomic for a while now and CoreOS still seems like a better option, if you're looking for a container-only OS that has been battle tested. Additionally, both companies seem like good places to work, with leadership that's often praised and has the results to show. I'm happy for CoreOS on this one, they're joining a company that I admire. Looking forward to see h…
Re: Red Hat to Acquire CoreOS
#19This is great news! I am not sure what happens to tectonic? Is is going to be part of OpenShift?
https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/faq-red-hat-acquire-coreos
It will probably continue to be available in some paid commercial offering with well defined releases and lifecycles, as well as a community-supported free-in-both-senses offering which moves faster. Red Hat repeatedly uses this model across their portfolio.
Can't answer the OpenShift question - I have no inside info from either company. But open sourcing it is the bigger impact.
Re: Red Hat to Acquire CoreOS
#20"Red Hat Enterprise Linux’s content, the foundation of our application ecosystem will remain our only Linux offering. Whereas, some of the delivery mechanisms pioneered by Container Linux will be reviewed by a joint integration team and reconciled with Atomic." So long, Container Linux, we hardly knew ye... ?
What is the source? I didn't see that in the linked article.