Paxos derived
muratbuffalo.blogspot.com
Paxos derived
1–10 of 16 posts
Re: Paxos derived
#2Re: Paxos derived
#3Re: Paxos derived
#4Re: Paxos derived
#5https://ug93tad.github.io/consensus/
And on the topic of Paxos, some recent HN discussion:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16003662 - WPaxos: a wide area network Paxos protocol
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13923949 - Paxos in 25 Lines
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13950493 - Gryadka is not Paxos, so it's probably wrong [RETRACTED]
Re: Paxos derived
#6Blogspot? Now there's a TLD I haven't seen in years...
(The TLD is “com”, which you probably see fairly often in that role.)
Re: Paxos derived
#7Re: Paxos derived
#8Re: Paxos derived
#9Are we there yet? Do we need paxos-like consensus protocols? Hardware is becoming cheaper and commoditised and with all the hype around blockchain, it looks like people are ready to pay extra for the redundant hardware needed for 100% fault tolerance. Still, it feels to me to in almost all cases, including financial transactions, it's good enough to be right 99.999% of the time and just amortise the costs of the very…
...yes.
Re: Paxos derived
#10Similarly, Max Zorn used to ask people whether they recalled what Zorn's Lemma was introduced as a lemma to. (I haven't a clue, and I doubt most of them did either.)
Zorn introduced a "maximal principle" as an axiom. It appears Tukey called a generalization of it Zorn's Lemma for unknown reasons, though there is some version of the statement that really is proved, but apparently by Chevalley (a fact Zorn knew).