Live data from Hacker News

Tokyo-based cryptocurrency exchange hacked, losing $530M: NHK

reuters.com

231–240 of 312 posts

Re: Tokyo-based cryptocurrency exchange hacked, losing $530M: NHK

#231

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Imagine you have 2 sets of keys to your house and if you lose both then your house is not yours anymore. That's what keeping your money outside an exchange seems like to me. Exchanges are easy and familiar to people. If there was some secure way to do password recovery that was built into the currency that might be a game changer. That might be impossible by definition, not sure.

I think you definitively could make something like Keybase on Bitcoin, by using multiple third-party institutions (chosen by the user) as a fallback. When sending coins to your storage address, you'd say "anyone can use this money if they have this private key OR if they get a digitally-signed certificate from 3 out of 4 of these keys (A, B, C, D)". Those keys could belong to different institutions (or persons) that…

It's called "multisig wallet", and a lot of reputable online wallets implement this.

Instead of doing what you suggested, normally it's 2 of 3 where it's your cold wallet, your hot wallet, and the online wallet provider.

Re: Tokyo-based cryptocurrency exchange hacked, losing $530M: NHK

#232

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because this way you have a public ledger that can't be mutated without notifying the public. Not everything that blockchain gives is for the trust distributed use case. For that fact, proof of work is the only thing that is purely there because bitcoin's blockchain needs a distributed trust system.

> Because this way you have a public ledger that can't be mutated without notifying the public. Can't this be done with something like git?

Which is basically what a blockchain is... Just that instead of a cryptographically append-only acyclic directed graph, its a cryptographically append-only linked list.

Re: Tokyo-based cryptocurrency exchange hacked, losing $530M: NHK

#233

Earlier quoted context omitted.

'Money ain't got no owners, only spenders' -Omar Little This quote applies to unregulated markets: drugs or cryptocurrencies.

I had to look that quote up to fully understand it, plus find the clip online, so here is the context: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtoM9x-Bfu8 Omar robs drug kingpin Marlo who is at a card night, sat round the table, raking in winnings. Marlo claims the money is his, in response Omar says “Man, money ain’t got no owners, only spenders.” He then goes on to take Marlo's ring rather than just run off with the $$$. S…

[deleted]

Re: Tokyo-based cryptocurrency exchange hacked, losing $530M: NHK

#234

They are tainting the stolen coins to avoid them to be sold. What’s the point of having a decentralized currency if a centralized entity make the decisions anyway at the end of day?

Perhaps I am misunderstanding how tracking coins typically happens, but if "tainting" the coins effectively prohibits the actors from withdrawing at their perceived value, how would this work if the actor decided to send the vast majority coins to many random, arbitrary accounts? (e.g. arbitrarily sending coins to everyone who has committed a trade on some exchange in the last X days.) Would enough information be kno…

> how would this work if the actor decided to send the vast majority coins to many random, arbitrary accounts? (e.g. arbitrarily sending coins to everyone who has

Then they'd have to take those coins off the blacklist, or else prepare to deal with an increasingly intractable tracking problem. Ethically, that would be the less bad option, since the thief would be deprived off the income, even if it's not returned to the victim.

Re: Tokyo-based cryptocurrency exchange hacked, losing $530M: NHK

#235
post #220

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Imagine you have 2 sets of keys to your house and if you lose both then your house is not yours anymore. That's what keeping your money outside an exchange seems like to me. Exchanges are easy and familiar to people. If there was some secure way to do password recovery that was built into the currency that might be a game changer. That might be impossible by definition, not sure.

Do you have M friends, of which you're certain at most N-1 would collaborate to steal from you and/or get hacked? In that case, you can do secure password recovery. Shamir's secret sharing algorithm can be applied over many groups other than GF(2^N). In particular, you can generate a polynomial of degree N where F(0) is your ECDSA private key, and for 1 You can even have N parties each generate their own secret rando…

I should add that with Schnorr signatures, if you have a bunch of signatures on the same H, you can add up all of the (R,S) pairs of signatures, and the result is a single signature where the public key is the sum of all of the public keys of the N signers. This allows very compact storage and verification of multi-party signatures. All of these nice properties are just consequences of the linear composability of Schnorr signatures.

BitCoin, at present, only supports ECDSA signatures, which aren't linearly composable.

Re: Tokyo-based cryptocurrency exchange hacked, losing $530M: NHK

#236
post #192
post #180

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why not using a web site built on postgres or mysql database to track balances then, instead of using blockchain and call the thing "cryptocurrency"?

Because then it would be evident to anyone that you were running a pyramid scheme and law enforcement could shut you down by just closing down a single server?

Is it still applicable to NEM, as it's centralized?

Re: Tokyo-based cryptocurrency exchange hacked, losing $530M: NHK

#237

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Perhaps I am misunderstanding how tracking coins typically happens, but if "tainting" the coins effectively prohibits the actors from withdrawing at their perceived value, how would this work if the actor decided to send the vast majority coins to many random, arbitrary accounts? (e.g. arbitrarily sending coins to everyone who has committed a trade on some exchange in the last X days.) Would enough information be kno…

> how would this work if the actor decided to send the vast majority coins to many random, arbitrary accounts? (e.g. arbitrarily sending coins to everyone who has Then they'd have to take those coins off the blacklist, or else prepare to deal with an increasingly intractable tracking problem. Ethically, that would be the less bad option, since the thief would be deprived off the income, even if it's not returned to t…

What if a portion of those sent coins are sent to attacker-owned wallets?

Re: Tokyo-based cryptocurrency exchange hacked, losing $530M: NHK

#238
post #211
post #188

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why is "Statistics" called "Machine Learning" ? $$hype$$

insinuating that the only reason people say machine learning and not statistics is just false. the term machine learning refers to a specific part of statistics that is very different from statistics as a whole.

He is making that exact point.

Re: Tokyo-based cryptocurrency exchange hacked, losing $530M: NHK

#239
post #41
post #3

Conclusion: If you keep any cryptocurrency on an exchange or online service that can or is capable of controlling your private keys - MOVE all your cryptos to your own deterministic wallet YESTERDAY!

I think the biggest problem is having a single point of failure. I personally keep about half my coins on exchanges, but no exchange holds more than 10%. Storing your coins might be the best solution in theory, but in practice unless you're very savvy about the whole stack - hardware, OS, software and blockchain tech, it's hard to be sure you're not making a dumb mistake and exposing your whole stack. Even hardware w…

You can keep just 10% on bitmex and use upto 10x leverage. If you get liquidated take another 10% out. If you make profit, send it back to the icebox.

Re: Tokyo-based cryptocurrency exchange hacked, losing $530M: NHK

#240

Posting this as a top level comment as well (probably a better idea): The coins stolen are XEM ( https://nem.io/ ) not Bitcoin. They're currently tracking the stolen coins to ensure they are not sold. Preliminary evidence suggests that it was a private key stolen and not a network problem. Disclaimer: Am somewhat associated with the team, and I hold a small amount of XEM. Feel free to ask questions.

Genuinely curious: How do you know a private key is stolen with a cryptocurrency? Is there some sort of secondary proof mechanism?
Post reply on HN