Earlier quoted context omitted.
See here you've gone straight into making a value judgement that you don't believe Bitcoin is useful, therefore we should permit Logan Paul videos but we shouldn't permit Bitcoin. But other people are happy to spend their money to buy electricity to burn it to mine Bitcoin. Just as you're okay with people spending money to watch ads and download videos. And without installing monitoring in everyone's home to make sur…
> here you've gone straight into making a value judgement Much like you did when you said: > to serve fake images and shitty news ?
One Bitcoin miner is buying 20,000 16nm wafers from TSMC per month
221–230 of 231 posts
Re: One Bitcoin miner is buying 20,000 16nm wafers from TSMC per month
#222The amount of waste of Bitcoin Mining is incredible. It is all about virtual digital mining, which is to race to find the first hash, that has X number of zeros in the front of it. And this burns an incredible amount of electricity. And all for what? Just to show proof of work. Can't there be a more useful usage of cryptocurrency mining to show proof of work? Something that is more relevant to humanity. Like protein…
It is impossible to create a "useful" PoW. The issue comes down to incentives. As bitcoin is a decentralized, trust-less system, there needs to be constant and powerful incentives to prevent miners from cheating (by creating forks, or executing any number of other attacks). The current main incentive against cheating is that miners will lose their invested PoW (compute time + electricity) if they cheat and get their…
Re: One Bitcoin miner is buying 20,000 16nm wafers from TSMC per month
#223Earlier quoted context omitted.
See here you've gone straight into making a value judgement that you don't believe Bitcoin is useful, therefore we should permit Logan Paul videos but we shouldn't permit Bitcoin. But other people are happy to spend their money to buy electricity to burn it to mine Bitcoin. Just as you're okay with people spending money to watch ads and download videos. And without installing monitoring in everyone's home to make sur…
> here you've gone straight into making a value judgement Much like you did when you said: > to serve fake images and shitty news ?
Re: One Bitcoin miner is buying 20,000 16nm wafers from TSMC per month
#224Earlier quoted context omitted.
One could structure it such that a single PoW is useless, yet multiple aren't? Like pieces of a puzzle that only make sense once you collect many of them.
Like McDonald’s monopoly tokens? Won’t a market simply develop where people can buy / sell / exchange tokens?
Re: One Bitcoin miner is buying 20,000 16nm wafers from TSMC per month
#225From the article- Bitmain, the largest Bitcoin miner on the planet, is now buying a whopping 20,000 16nm wafers a month from TSMC! That's double as much as in the previous quarter and a higher volume than what NVIDIA orders from TSMC. Related material- https://www.gmo.jp/en/news/article/?id=764 A competitor to Bitmain just finished their prototype 12nm Bitcoin mining chip and is moving forward to their target 7nm min…
> A competitor to Bitmain just finished their prototype 12nm Bitcoin mining chip and is moving forward to their target 7nm mining chip Huh, maybe the dark fibre of Bitcoin will be cheap silicon and subsidized fab research.
If you think that the world needs ever more efficient ASICs for computing sha256 hashes, then sure.
Re: One Bitcoin miner is buying 20,000 16nm wafers from TSMC per month
#226From the article- Bitmain, the largest Bitcoin miner on the planet, is now buying a whopping 20,000 16nm wafers a month from TSMC! That's double as much as in the previous quarter and a higher volume than what NVIDIA orders from TSMC. Related material- https://www.gmo.jp/en/news/article/?id=764 A competitor to Bitmain just finished their prototype 12nm Bitcoin mining chip and is moving forward to their target 7nm min…
How long do you think it takes them to amortize them?
About 6 months at current prices with cheap electricity (https://shop.bitmain.com/productDetail.htm?pid=0002018010910...
https://www.cryptocompare.com/mining/calculator/btc?HashingP...
Re: One Bitcoin miner is buying 20,000 16nm wafers from TSMC per month
#227The amount of waste of Bitcoin Mining is incredible. It is all about virtual digital mining, which is to race to find the first hash, that has X number of zeros in the front of it. And this burns an incredible amount of electricity. And all for what? Just to show proof of work. Can't there be a more useful usage of cryptocurrency mining to show proof of work? Something that is more relevant to humanity. Like protein…
Re: One Bitcoin miner is buying 20,000 16nm wafers from TSMC per month
#228The amount of waste of Bitcoin Mining is incredible. It is all about virtual digital mining, which is to race to find the first hash, that has X number of zeros in the front of it. And this burns an incredible amount of electricity. And all for what? Just to show proof of work. Can't there be a more useful usage of cryptocurrency mining to show proof of work? Something that is more relevant to humanity. Like protein…
I think that as the value of bitcoin decreases, a lot of the mining will stop for want of profitability. Right now it's still Klondyke days and everybody is out there with his pickaxe. In a few months, slightly used pickaxes, or in this case GPUs, will be cheap and plentiful. It's stupid while it lasts bit fortunately it won't. Bitcoin has no practical utility, neither as currency nor as a store of value, and you can…
No but you're right. This time it will be gone for good.
lol
Re: One Bitcoin miner is buying 20,000 16nm wafers from TSMC per month
#229On top of that, Etherium mining is eating the graphics board market. The price of NVidia's higher end boards has doubled in the last six months.[1] Etherium was supposed to require a general purpose CPU to mine, but now it's done on GPUs with large RAM. [1] https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/01/cryptocurrency-b...
Re: One Bitcoin miner is buying 20,000 16nm wafers from TSMC per month
#230Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is impossible to create a "useful" PoW. The issue comes down to incentives. As bitcoin is a decentralized, trust-less system, there needs to be constant and powerful incentives to prevent miners from cheating (by creating forks, or executing any number of other attacks). The current main incentive against cheating is that miners will lose their invested PoW (compute time + electricity) if they cheat and get their…
> The current main incentive against cheating is that miners will lose their invested PoW (compute time + electricity) if they cheat and get their block thrown out. However, with a useful PoW, this calculus changes. Now, the PoW is no longer "wasted" when the miner cheats and gets caught as the PoW is now useful for something besides mining. So you spend $x on (compute time + electricity) to mine a useful PoW worth $…
That just makes $x grow to $previous_x + $y.