101–110 of 188 posts
So is this the end of Google captchas asking for where the car/sign/whatever is? Will there be a final battle of AIs, where they will kill each other, and the unfettered access to websites over VPN/tor wins and laughs the last laugh?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
For the car captchas, I've found actually clicking all the boxes with part of a car will always be a wrong answer (distinct from when it just makes you answer twice). Instead, you have to click on the squares that you know it thinks are cars. This creates a twisted Turing test situation where, to prove you are a human, you have to pretend to be a machine's idea of what a human is.
The problem with the cars for me is their definition -- is that van classed as a car, how about the half-back, what about a 4x4, what about a 4x4 with no back windows, ...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The problem with the cars for me is their definition -- is that van classed as a car, how about the half-back, what about a 4x4, what about a 4x4 with no back windows, ...
What about a square that contains just a sliver of the car from the next box over? Does that still count? I hypothesize that my attempt to classify every pixel related to a car as a "car" may contribute to my failing of these tests.
This is relying on proprietary CUDA technology. This doesn't qualify as Free Software to me.
So is this the end of Google captchas asking for where the car/sign/whatever is? Will there be a final battle of AIs, where they will kill each other, and the unfettered access to websites over VPN/tor wins and laughs the last laugh?
For the car captchas, I've found actually clicking all the boxes with part of a car will always be a wrong answer (distinct from when it just makes you answer twice). Instead, you have to click on the squares that you know it thinks are cars. This creates a twisted Turing test situation where, to prove you are a human, you have to pretend to be a machine's idea of what a human is.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your https-everywhere is doing it wrong. I don't have an SSL on my personal site (no requirement to). I do have SSL on other domains that share that IP however.
I'm not expert on this but what I'm seeing is that port 443 is serving up a response when jaruzel.com is requested on that port. While you may not be actively advertising that domain with https URLs, it is valid for clients to request one speculatively. There isn't a valid cert for that domain and for some reason for server is offering a different one. Presumably you need to unbind 443 from that host header name (thi…
The only response is a 404, which is exactly what should be displayed (to the best of my knowledge) for a domain that isn't configured for that IP/port when there are other sites utilizing that IP/port.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is no arms race. 99.9% of the time Google knows if you're a robot based on your browser state. They make you label the images because it's a free way to get training data.
I see this argument a lot and considered it the case to, but I have to wonder if that really is the case. Wouldn't google be empowering people to really mess up their training data? If I'm trying to automate a system to fool their captcha, I'm probably getting a lot of bad results. Or I could just be intentionally feeding them bad data, the fact that not being allowed through captcha keeps letting me make more and mo…
So is this the end of Google captchas asking for where the car/sign/whatever is? Will there be a final battle of AIs, where they will kill each other, and the unfettered access to websites over VPN/tor wins and laughs the last laugh?
For the car captchas, I've found actually clicking all the boxes with part of a car will always be a wrong answer (distinct from when it just makes you answer twice). Instead, you have to click on the squares that you know it thinks are cars. This creates a twisted Turing test situation where, to prove you are a human, you have to pretend to be a machine's idea of what a human is.
