Live data from Hacker News

Tsunami warning ends for B.C. after large earthquake strikes off Alaska

cbc.ca

51–60 of 98 posts

Re: Tsunami warning ends for B.C. after large earthquake strikes off Alaska

#51
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's true. Maybe when a buoy registers an "event", an "snapshot" of more fine-grained 15-sec data is recorded from all DART buoys? Edit. From this page: http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/dart/dart.shtml > The system has two data reporting modes, standard and event. The system operates routinely in standard mode, in which four spot values (of the 15-s data) at 15-minute intervals of the estimated sea surface height are repor…

I see, thanks. But that rather sounds like the buoy itself is switching modes? From the look of all the plots, even the far-away ones, it rather looks to me like they have been remotely switched into event mode (with that 15s stuff being plotted at about the same time)? I guess I am really confused about the time stamps.

Based on this page, linked by someone just above, it sounds like they do have 2-way comms (Iridium) and can remotely be put into 'Event Mode'.

http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/dart/dart.shtml

I think it's a combo of noise when that was activated (see the page above, describes exactly what it reports when it goes into that mode, etc) -- and then for the one that shows a substantial sea level rise, it's likely just the pressure since it's all pressure-based sea-level measurement "estimates". Guess I kind of thought it measured actual rise/fall of the buoy, or maybe used GPS or something, but makes a bit more sense that it's solely based on sea-floor pressure.

Re: Tsunami warning ends for B.C. after large earthquake strikes off Alaska

#53
post #52

I hope everything is okay - but I’m finding this a fascinating real-time case study of the chaotic nature of breaking information during a (potential) disaster. Conflicting reports, false alarms, difficult-to-parse data...

And a number of false-but-believable tweets by people, I presume for the attention. E.g. "Harbor X is emptying", or "Wave now 60ft high!"

Re: Tsunami warning ends for B.C. after large earthquake strikes off Alaska

#54
post #53
post #52

I hope everything is okay - but I’m finding this a fascinating real-time case study of the chaotic nature of breaking information during a (potential) disaster. Conflicting reports, false alarms, difficult-to-parse data...

And a number of false-but-believable tweets by people, I presume for the attention. E.g. "Harbor X is emptying", or "Wave now 60ft high!"

There was a study done a while back basically demonstrating that following breaking news too closely actually resulted in a less accurate recollection of the facts. Turns out it’s difficult to forget compelling information even if it ultimately proves to be false (and you’re aware that it’s false).

Re: Tsunami warning ends for B.C. after large earthquake strikes off Alaska

#55
https://twitter.com/SF_emergency/status/955764708442714113

San Francisco Department of Emergency Management has tweeted that people within three blocks of the coast or five blocks of the San Francisco Bay should be prepared to evacuate.

Tsunami Watch for #SF. If you are w/in SF & 3 blocks of the Pacific Coast or w/in 5 blocks of SF Bay, PREPARE TO EVACUATE SO YOU ARE READY IF EVACUATION IS NEEDED. Check on neighbors who may need help. Visit http://sf72.org/hazard/tsunamis to see if you are in the evacuation zone.

Re: Tsunami warning ends for B.C. after large earthquake strikes off Alaska

#56
post #54
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And a number of false-but-believable tweets by people, I presume for the attention. E.g. "Harbor X is emptying", or "Wave now 60ft high!"

There was a study done a while back basically demonstrating that following breaking news too closely actually resulted in a less accurate recollection of the facts. Turns out it’s difficult to forget compelling information even if it ultimately proves to be false (and you’re aware that it’s false).

Source?

Re: Tsunami warning ends for B.C. after large earthquake strikes off Alaska

#57

https://twitter.com/SF_emergency/status/955764708442714113 San Francisco Department of Emergency Management has tweeted that people within three blocks of the coast or five blocks of the San Francisco Bay should be prepared to evacuate. Tsunami Watch for #SF. If you are w/in SF & 3 blocks of the Pacific Coast or w/in 5 blocks of SF Bay, PREPARE TO EVACUATE SO YOU ARE READY IF EVACUATION IS NEEDED. Check on neighbors…

We like to laugh about the Tuesday siren tests, but times like this are why we do them. If a tsunami really does hit WA and OR expect the waterfront sirens to make a pre-dawn announcement.

Re: Tsunami warning ends for B.C. after large earthquake strikes off Alaska

#58

https://twitter.com/SF_emergency/status/955764708442714113 San Francisco Department of Emergency Management has tweeted that people within three blocks of the coast or five blocks of the San Francisco Bay should be prepared to evacuate. Tsunami Watch for #SF. If you are w/in SF & 3 blocks of the Pacific Coast or w/in 5 blocks of SF Bay, PREPARE TO EVACUATE SO YOU ARE READY IF EVACUATION IS NEEDED. Check on neighbors…

Tsunami watch has been cancelled for Washington, Oregon, and California.

https://twitter.com/NWSEureka/status/955777068377296896

Re: Tsunami warning ends for B.C. after large earthquake strikes off Alaska

#59

When was the most recent ‘red’ tsunami warning for US west coast & BC? Which coastal areas were physically affected by that one? Edit: 2005 review: https://soundwaves.usgs.gov/2005/01/fieldwork2.html Lessons: https://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/c1187/

There's a difference between a watch and a warning.
Post reply on HN