Earlier quoted context omitted.
Have you ever considered things that men have to deal with and are not being able to put them in terms of 'being male in the X industry/community/field"? This is not to minimize anything a woman has to go through, but let's, at least, not compare as if it's on equal terms. If we're able to talk about women issues at all, isn't that because women and men are different? Why compare it so easily and uni-dimensionally? B…
A man worries a woman won’t like him. A woman worries a man will kill her.
Experiments reveal faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track (2014)
21–30 of 116 posts
Re: Experiments reveal faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track (2014)
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
Have you ever considered things that men have to deal with and are not being able to put them in terms of 'being male in the X industry/community/field"? This is not to minimize anything a woman has to go through, but let's, at least, not compare as if it's on equal terms. If we're able to talk about women issues at all, isn't that because women and men are different? Why compare it so easily and uni-dimensionally? B…
A man worries a woman won’t like him. A woman worries a man will kill her.
Re: Experiments reveal faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track (2014)
#23Perhaps the lack of women in STEM is a first world phenomenon. In my third world undergraduate CS class, 10 years ago, there were 40 women and 20 men. I would say it even appeared to me that more women were in college than men.The few courses were I found less women than men were in Mechanical Engineering departments.
Re: Experiments reveal faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track (2014)
#24Very interesting. I presume this isn't a blind test though, so could there be a "ooo they're testing for sexism, better pick the women!" factor? Or did they account for that somehow? Edit: Skimmed it and they did go to significant lengths to disguise their hypothesis. Details on page 2 of the PDF.
Without this being a double-blind experiment, than it is highly questionable. People over-compensate for bias if you tell them you're testing their bias. The fact that the abstract makes no mention of this is highly suspect.
Re: Experiments reveal faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track (2014)
#25Perhaps the lack of women in STEM is a first world phenomenon. In my third world undergraduate CS class, 10 years ago, there were 40 women and 20 men. I would say it even appeared to me that more women were in college than men.The few courses were I found less women than men were in Mechanical Engineering departments.
Basically, most women choose to not pursue engineering if they don't have to (unfortunately, I'm glad we have some women at the office).
Re: Experiments reveal faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track (2014)
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't think so. I think the everyday experience for female academics still lags behind that of male academics. If you're an undergrad in an unfamiliar hard class it can be tricky to approach a male fellow student without risking misinterpretation of romantic interest; if you're applying to grad school, letter writers are conditioned to talk about women in different ways ("diligent", not "brilliant", maybe); if you'…
>romantic interest Heh, I don't know about other STEM fields but I remember a lady attending a computer science freshman social event once. There were very few women there as the majority of women in CS are in HTI. After a while she said to my friend, "Why is everyone such a nerd." She left the field, men were at fault.
Re: Experiments reveal faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track (2014)
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
A man worries a woman won’t like him. A woman worries a man will kill her.
The chances of that happening with your typical Dilbertian white male software engineer are vanishingly small.
Re: Experiments reveal faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track (2014)
#28Perhaps the lack of women in STEM is a first world phenomenon. In my third world undergraduate CS class, 10 years ago, there were 40 women and 20 men. I would say it even appeared to me that more women were in college than men.The few courses were I found less women than men were in Mechanical Engineering departments.
Take for example the first source[0], which only has a difference of 962 women to 1082 men accepted into the scientific faculty. At DTU[1] it varies more, although anything with Bio, Environment or Medicin in the name will be skewed more towards women.
I guess my point is: why do we insist there is some inherent bias against someone in society, if there is not a 50/50 split (which would in itself be weird)? If given completely free choice, perhaps some people are just disposed to being in interested in different things.
Disclaimer: I should probably say that the above of course only applies to Denmark, and I cannot talk on behalf of the situation in the US.
[0]: http://studier.ku.dk/bachelor/ansoegning-og-optagelse/optage...
[1]: https://www.google.dk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd...
[2]: https://www.dst.dk/da/Statistik/emner/levevilkaar/ligestilli...
EDIT: Added source on first claim about more women being educated.
Re: Experiments reveal faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track (2014)
#29Perhaps the lack of women in STEM is a first world phenomenon. In my third world undergraduate CS class, 10 years ago, there were 40 women and 20 men. I would say it even appeared to me that more women were in college than men.The few courses were I found less women than men were in Mechanical Engineering departments.
China has similar, if not worse problems, as the USA. The lab I worked for in Beijing made lots of effort to attract female researchers, and it was still very lopsided.