Live data from Hacker News

Intel to buy McAfee for $7.7 Billion

dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com

121–130 of 130 posts

Re: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.7 Billion

#121
Intel's fortunes are closely tied with Windows. With the rise of the ARM devices, decline of Windows, AND having other x86 manufacturers closing in, Intel has to pivot.

Security is a nice subscription business to be in. The nature of security business is essentially a fight between the providers and the malware publishers. As the computing platform fragments again, you need to be a large company to comprehensively support multiple kinds of devices.

As we start to see more netbooks, slates, smartphones deployed across the enterprise, each device presents Intel another opportunity to make money on a chip it didn't have to manufacture.

Re: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.7 Billion

#123
Does anyone know if this has to go through shareholder approval? Maybe there is a chance we can defeat this. I'm a shareholder and I'm considering dumping the stock. I haven't seen anything this bad since the AOL/TimeWarner debacle.

Re: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.7 Billion

#124

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No thank you! AV software is not security, it's a stopgap measure for when you have to "do something" but are too lazy to implement real security measures. And McAfee is one of the lowest quality AV vendors out there (remember when they pushed out a definition update that made XP instances unbootable? that costs a lot of people a lot of headache, and millions of dollars).

Agreed. Just wait till they push the signature to the flash om some special chip that calls a vital windows binary a virus. Not only will you not be able to boot, you won't even be able to reinstall, or pxe-boot, or run a live cd... Thats one deep rabbit hole.

Aye. And imagine how much damage false-positives can have on smaller software companies. A company like MS runs all of its binaries through the major virus scanners as a matter of course for any release build, not just to check for viruses but to make sure that they don't get tagged by a broken heuristic detector or some such. But not every company has that luxury (and even so, it didn't save XP from McAfee's blunder).

Besides which, all AV amounts to variations on turd polishing. You'll never achieve robust security through black-list methods.

Re: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.7 Billion

#126
I found this article[1] provides an interesting explanation: Intel is trying to integrate anti-virus software into mobile devices chips so that they can catch the mobilization wave. Feels quite similar to Intel's acquisition of many other vertical chip makers[2].

Now, how this is valued is something I still don't understand. Will this be another EBay-skype type of acquisition that'll end up break up again?

[1]: http://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/intel-looks-to-secure-mcafe...

[2]: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&tbs=cdr%3A1%2Ccd_min%...

Re: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.7 Billion

#127
Maybe Intel needs more office space in Santa Clara? ;) What does it make a price per sq. foot for McAfee office space?

Also by acquiring a company with $2B revenues (and only $173M net profit) - they can do a lot of "creative accounting". The kind of large corporations usually do at the expense of shareholders and taxpayers...

Re: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.7 Billion

#128

Earlier quoted context omitted.

7.7 Billion dollars for UI design? It seems strange that Intel is investing in this particular sector that leverages mostly Windows stuff. They should move out of Steve Ballmer's basement and make their own OS. Why do they want to make software for platforms when their competencies are on hardware? One that doesn't look like a antivirus program for Windows.

They should move out of Steve Ballmer's basement and make their own OS. Yeah, that won't have antitrust implications, or anything.

Would it? I don't think so. Which part of the antitrust laws would that violate?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_antitrust_law

Re: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.7 Billion

#130
post #84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You might want to brush up on the Glass-Steagall Act, which expressly prohibits these types of activities within organizations. i.e. ... "The Wall" And with Goldman under the regulatory microscope right now, I bet they are on the straight and narrow.

The glass-steagall act which was repealed in the late 90s and which many people point to as the key piece of deregulation that kicked off the housing bubble?

cynicism these days seems to not be recognized.
Post reply on HN