Live data from Hacker News

QDirStat – Treemap Visualization of Directory Statistics

github.com

11–20 of 49 posts

Re: QDirStat – Treemap Visualization of Directory Statistics

#11
post #5

Similar tool for windows: https://windirstat.net

Here's WizTree which is similar to WinDirStat but runs much faster: http://antibody-software.com/web/software/software/wiztree-f...

Wow, that's way faster than WinDirStat. Thanks for the link! This is awesome.

Re: QDirStat – Treemap Visualization of Directory Statistics

#14
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Screenshots: https://dev.yorhel.nl/ncdu/scr

ncdu works well and is pretty fast.

Yeah i use it all the time and is one of the programs that makes me question my use of GUIs for anything beyond media players and web browsing.

Re: QDirStat – Treemap Visualization of Directory Statistics

#17
Gosh there are a lot of these programs, aren't there?

For some reason I find it really hard to read these tree map visualisations. I know the theory and all that, but for me they just aren't an intuitive way of displaying that kind of information. For me a radial graph (i.e. pie chart like) is much easier to grok - I don't even have to think about it, I just get it. Seems like there must be plenty of people who don't think the same way though, given how many different tree map disk viewers there are out there!

For what it's worth I use Diskitude (http://madebyevan.com/diskitude/) on Windows and Daisy Disk (https://daisydiskapp.com/) on Mac. Both are great!

Re: QDirStat – Treemap Visualization of Directory Statistics

#19
post #6

For Linux/KDE: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filelight I find it looks better and it has some dolphin (file manager) integration.

Any other linux based options? Perhaps for gnome?

Baobab ships with gnome (in the menus as "disk usage analyzer")

Re: QDirStat – Treemap Visualization of Directory Statistics

#20
post #17

Gosh there are a lot of these programs, aren't there? For some reason I find it really hard to read these tree map visualisations. I know the theory and all that, but for me they just aren't an intuitive way of displaying that kind of information. For me a radial graph (i.e. pie chart like) is much easier to grok - I don't even have to think about it, I just get it. Seems like there must be plenty of people who don't…

There's a few reasons why rectangular shapes are superior... They fill the available space better than circles, and you can generally compare areas in rectangular shapes better than areas with curves. But, generally you're using these tools to spot outliers, in which case either approach works just fine.
Post reply on HN