Why is it that everyone is so concerned about where to start? Location is important, but having a product out, or at least a prototype available, is more important. You can do this anywhere, and when you get seed money or funding later, you can move to somewhere glamorous. It's like moving to Hollywood because you want to be an actor or writer. If you're the coder--especially if you're the coding founder--you can mak…
Because where you start appears to influence -- heavily -- where you end up, or if you end up doing anything important. How many big tech companies began and stayed in in Madison, WI, or in Florida? Almost none.
There's a whole field dedicated to examining why and how this happens: economic geography. See here for a decent intro: http://eh.net/encyclopedia/article/patton.carpet . The carpet industry in Georgia is one such example; Internet startups in Silicon Valley are another; movies in L.A. is a third; and so on.
It's like moving to Hollywood because you want to be an actor or writer.
Take a look at William Goldman's Adventures in the Screen Trade, where he says:
"I find Los Angeles a very difficult and potentially dangerous place to work in, and I think anyone seriously contemplating a career as a screenwriter ought to move there as soon as it's humanly or financially possible" {Goldman@74}.
Later:
Screenwriters should go to L.A. despite the problems. As Goldman says, "To begin with the practical: Simply put, they know things out there the rest of the country doesn't, and they get that information first. The movie business is a part of the fabric of life in Los Angeles, and that just isn't true anywhere else. It is, if you will, in the air" {Goldman@80}.
People who ignore this ignore it at their own peril.