Live data from Hacker News

Lyft says nearly 250K of its passengers ditched a personal car in 2017

techcrunch.com

421–430 of 438 posts

Re: Lyft says nearly 250K of its passengers ditched a personal car in 2017

#421
post #417
post #411

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> In any case, how far does one take the fun-vs-impact dilemma? Is using a couple of dollars worth of gas worse than killing a 7 yr old top-of-food-chain wild predator so we can have a fresh tuna sushi roll? Does it make sense to keep thousands of buses running at 10% capacity 7 days a week when we could all just stay home watching youtube and eating delivered food? One can draw an arbitrary line anywhere but unless…

> There are degrees of selfishness I don't think anyone's disputing that. I just find it weird that someone would call out another person's lifestyle as "vacuous consumerism" or whatever when they have their own nowhere-near-ideal-but-somehow-arbitrarily-kosher footprint. You might, for example, recycle but I'm not going to be giving anyone crap if they aren't as meticulous about it as the japanese are. I keep hearin…

> I keep hearing "well here in europe you don't need a car as much" as if that's some sort of sound argument. I mean, that's great for them, but I don't speak french, dutch and certainly not norwegian, so what, I'm supposed to spend $10k+ to move my whole family there so I can lug around a stroller or a bag full of books on the train for the sake of the planet? Sorry, not gonna happen.

A lot of Americans talk as though needing a car is a law of nature, which just isn't the case. From a European perspective a lot of this is Americans shooting themselves in the foot and then saying they can't help bleeding everywhere. The American situation is one that's been created by American political decisions - zoning, parking minimums, minimum lot sizes, car-first city designs - and can be reversed by politics as well, but for Americans to make those changes they have to believe that the results are possible. Of course you can choose to keep operating on everyone-owns-a-car politics, but recognise that you do have a choice in the matter; recognise that approaches like the currently-under-discussion California SB 827 could create an America that's less car-dependent.

> And that's my whole point: different people have different lifestyles for various reasons. One's single european lifestyle is not necessarily going to work for someone else living somewhere else with a family.

But non-car does work for a lot of people across many different lifestyles, including Americans, including people with families. You're painting it as if the only people who could possibly disagree with you are this tiny box of single European instagramming metrosexuals, and actually it's you that's the small box. Most of the world's households do not own a car.

> If anything, the "you have car, you bad" attitude is self-absorbed and short-sighted.

Global warming is already going to kill millions of people in the best case, if we do everything we can - but what we do can make the difference between how many millions die. The current American level of car use is simply not sustainable; maybe avoiding it is going to mean worse lives for your kids or less chance to see your family, but ultimately if it comes down to a choice between those things and killing 80% of humanity there can only be one answer.

But really I don't believe it's that hard. For decades incandescent light bulb manufacturers claimed they couldn't possibly make a light bulb that was more efficient - but then when we actually legally mandated certain levels of efficiency, somehow they found a way. A good life without a car is possible, and when cars become a non-option people will surprise themselves with how easy it is to adapt to their absence, and wonder what it was they ever thought they needed them for.

Re: Lyft says nearly 250K of its passengers ditched a personal car in 2017

#422
post #353

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I know that the sportiness and novelty of a car drives up the insurance price but it doesn't seem to as much as I thought, my friend recently got a new WRX and pays very very little in insurance for it considering he's a 22 year old male. But yeah it being a beater makes sense, I just got quotes for a 1981 Honda Civic in Seattle and some are even less than $700/year.

pays very very little in insurance for it considering he's a 22 year old male As an aside, in the UK it is illegal for an insurance company to consider gender when calculating the premium.

Well that just seems cruel and arbitrary.

Re: Lyft says nearly 250K of its passengers ditched a personal car in 2017

#423
post #421
post #417

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> There are degrees of selfishness I don't think anyone's disputing that. I just find it weird that someone would call out another person's lifestyle as "vacuous consumerism" or whatever when they have their own nowhere-near-ideal-but-somehow-arbitrarily-kosher footprint. You might, for example, recycle but I'm not going to be giving anyone crap if they aren't as meticulous about it as the japanese are. I keep hearin…

> I keep hearing "well here in europe you don't need a car as much" as if that's some sort of sound argument. I mean, that's great for them, but I don't speak french, dutch and certainly not norwegian, so what, I'm supposed to spend $10k+ to move my whole family there so I can lug around a stroller or a bag full of books on the train for the sake of the planet? Sorry, not gonna happen. A lot of Americans talk as thou…

> A lot of Americans talk as though needing a car is a law of nature

I can't speak for other people (especially those who do live in really-car-first parts of the US), but for me it's definitely not a law of nature. I've been single with no car, married with no car, had a kid with no car, had a kid uptown with no car. Can it work? Sure, with some concessions it can totally work. But things like taking the newborn to the doctor using public transportation _suck_, even though I consider the public transit system _good_.

> Most of the world's households do not own a car.

Right, and the sort of logistics that sucked for me with just strolling one kid in downtown Toronto suck for them too, often tenfold. Where I grew up (Brazil), it's common for single moms of 4 to need to take 3-4 buses to get to their first job of the day. There's plate rotation, vehicle ownership tax, tolls, alternative forms of public transit, uber, but also high crime, floods, corruption, inequality, you name it. The cars-vs-public-transit discussion doesn't even begin to scratch the transportation problems in Sao Paulo, let alone the environmental impact. For my specific situation and my level of disposable income, a car happens to make life much easier, but I'm fully aware that cars aren't a one-glove-fit-all solution, just as I'm aware that making sweeping political commentary wrt city design isn't going to cut it as a solution to the many different types of challenges involved in optimizing transportation in a non-idealized world.

> You're painting it as if the only people who could possibly disagree with you are this tiny box of single European instagramming metrosexuals

Not at all! Not having a car does work for a lot of people, and in places like the Netherlands, one can even happily bike everywhere with their kids without getting almost killed by taxis. But cars can be undeniably useful for saving time and for carrying things around. People giving labor use cars to go to the hospital for a reason. People uber for a reason. People drive in much of the rural world for a reason. I'm not sure what's there to disagree with.

> recognise that you do have a choice in the matter; recognise that approaches like the currently-under-discussion California SB 827

Generally speaking, the problem with social activism is that most people don't have the time, energy or interest to pour into the political game, and it's not even clear that a half decent solution would emerge even if they did (see, e.g., housing in SF). For my particular case, as I mentioned before, I'm not american and I'm about as unmotivated to be politically invested in San Francisco as I am in Sao Paulo.

> A good life without a car is possible

Yes, it is, but currently, as I mentioned, it unfortunately involves making a lot of concessions. If a better option came along, I'd totally be open to it. As I said, I've held the anti-car position for a long time, and I'm certainly not shy to change camps again.

Re: Lyft says nearly 250K of its passengers ditched a personal car in 2017

#424

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah used is probably my best bet. It’s only 7 miles a day roundtrip.

7 is a perfect distance - what sort of roads? Id tend towards a commuting road bike with panniers, and mudguards/fenders.

It’s a well paved road. Think suburban mainstreet. Thanks for your help!

Re: Lyft says nearly 250K of its passengers ditched a personal car in 2017

#425
post #342
post #335

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In the winter too? I thought we were not talking about what's possible and what's not, I thought op was talking about equal convenience for him of owning a car vs using uber/lyft.

> In the winter too? (I'm not OP) Why not? I ride even during storms, much less shying away from what, some cold winds in winter? By the time you reach your destination if you're wearing the right clothing you not only won't feel cold, you might even feel too hot. If I ride for longer than 10 minutes I need to open my jacket or put it in my backpack to let some air in to prevent my body from sweating. Of all the seas…

Don’t you think cycling on a slippery road is quite dangerous since in US you have to ride your bike on a road with cars and can’t go on a sidewalk, so as soon as you fall down - you are very likely going to skid to a path of an incoming car. I don’t think saving a penny is worth this risk

Re: Lyft says nearly 250K of its passengers ditched a personal car in 2017

#426
post #138

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If it’s only a kilometre why not walk? That’s 15 minutes for the average person.

Would you want to walk in below freezing weather?

Yes, it can be more convenient to walk in cold weather as you don't stand still to wait and freeze at the bus stop

This was part of the reason I started walking 2 km to work rather than take the bus

Re: Lyft says nearly 250K of its passengers ditched a personal car in 2017

#427
post #388

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Cause we're all giving numbers here. Let me give you my numbers for my bike. I rent my bike and got a train subscription. I pay about 50 EUR a year for my bike and 100 EUR a year for my train subscription. I have a car, but I'm not the one paying insurance on it anymore (passed on to other family member). The car was 5000 EUR used (Volkswagen Polo) which was bought 7-8 years ago and it was a 5 year old car back then.…

Where do you pay 100€ a year for train tickets? In my city (Germany) it's about 1000€ a year.

Their posts indicate Ghent, still I'm struggling to believe those numbers

Re: Lyft says nearly 250K of its passengers ditched a personal car in 2017

#428
post #327

Not sure why so many people here are almost virtue signaling the act of not owning a drivers license. I agree—It's perfectly okay to not own a car if it doesn't make sense to your life situation. That being said, the ability to drive is nevertheless a useful skill and asset and at least in the United States, does not have a very high barrier to entry (for better or worse). There is so much in the United States that a…

> There is so much in the United States that a car gives you access to (most National Parks or wilderness in general are not accessible by public transport). They are accessible by tours, and friends, and cycling, and many other ways. You car people really seem to have a limited understanding of the real world, everything revolves around cars. You can't imagine doing something without a car.

> You car people really

Would you please not post flamebait to HN? It's against the guidelines and reliably wrecks discussion here.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re: Lyft says nearly 250K of its passengers ditched a personal car in 2017

#429
post #327

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> There is so much in the United States that a car gives you access to (most National Parks or wilderness in general are not accessible by public transport). They are accessible by tours, and friends, and cycling, and many other ways. You car people really seem to have a limited understanding of the real world, everything revolves around cars. You can't imagine doing something without a car.

> You car people Incredible as it may seem, there are people in the world who have life experiences and perspectives that differ from yours. Unsurprisingly, that results in them also having different opinions and making different choices. Clearly you feel that you've reached some kind of moral high ground, but there's no need to sneer at the rest of us from it.

Please don't respond to flamebait with flamewars. That's taking the bait.

Instead, as the site guidelines ask, flag the comment (if you have > 30 karma) or email us at hn@ycombinator.com.

Re: Lyft says nearly 250K of its passengers ditched a personal car in 2017

#430
post #399

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why not? I use ZipCar for long weekends frequently.

well, because it has a max 180 mile per day limit with per-mile costs above that. So if you're staying overnight, that's one thing, but doing a 2 hour, go kayaking, 2 hours back type drive doesn't work.

2 hours each way for a day-trip?! I'm always shocked that people suggest that much driving as a proportion of the total trip time.
Post reply on HN