Live data from Hacker News

Apple plans new U.S. campus, to pay $38B in foreign cash taxes

reuters.com

41–50 of 537 posts

Re: Apple plans new U.S. campus, to pay $38B in foreign cash taxes

#41

these corporations are just so full.of themselves. it's at least a little funny that this article gives me a steve holt vibe, being written in first person, but i feel apple has just created the headline and story they want the media to copy. i feel like apple would improve my life more (better phrased as stop impacting my life negatively) if they would spend as much time making their products work better instead of…

What makes you think Apple spends more time on marketing than product development?

Anybody could make their product better by diverting all their marketing budget into product development. It's not a particularly good business strategy, though.

Re: Apple plans new U.S. campus, to pay $38B in foreign cash taxes

#42
All the comments seem to be sketpical or negative. I think it's funny if you go back right before tax reform passed and look at all the comments on articles here on HN almost all were blasting tax reform. Saying it won't work, it does not help the economy, does not create jobs, and repatriation only leads to stock buybacks and executive bonuses.

So far we've seen company after company giving substantial bonuses to all employees, announcing expansions, repatriating large amounts of capital from overseas back to America.

Funny the nerative always seems to stay negative even though facts say otherwise.

Re: Apple plans new U.S. campus, to pay $38B in foreign cash taxes

#43

I'd like to know who those 9,000 American suppliers and manufacturers are. Other than Corning who supplies the Gorilla Glasses for almost all smartphone makers, I can't really name any significant domestic suppliers who would make up $55B of their "spending."

They're building domestic datacenters, not iPhone factories.

Re: Apple plans new U.S. campus, to pay $38B in foreign cash taxes

#44
post #11

I hate the phrase "job creation". It sounds almost like the "job creators" are of divine nature. How about "hiring"?

Job creation and hiring mean different things. I can hire someone for a job that already existed and was previously filled by someone else. If I bring a new job into existence, that hasn't been filled by anyone before then saying I created that job doesn't seem particularly untoward.

I anybody creates jobs it's the people who buy stuff and create demand. Then someone will meet that demand and potentially hire someone. I don't think Apple "creates" jobs. It hires people for certain needs that have been created by the market. If they don't fill the need somebody else will do in a market economy.

Re: Apple plans new U.S. campus, to pay $38B in foreign cash taxes

#45

All the comments seem to be sketpical or negative. I think it's funny if you go back right before tax reform passed and look at all the comments on articles here on HN almost all were blasting tax reform. Saying it won't work, it does not help the economy, does not create jobs, and repatriation only leads to stock buybacks and executive bonuses. So far we've seen company after company giving substantial bonuses to al…

To be fair the bonuses I've heard about have been laughable so far and accompanied by large lay offs in two cases (Walmart and Comcast).

Re: Apple plans new U.S. campus, to pay $38B in foreign cash taxes

#46
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Job creation and hiring mean different things. I can hire someone for a job that already existed and was previously filled by someone else. If I bring a new job into existence, that hasn't been filled by anyone before then saying I created that job doesn't seem particularly untoward.

I anybody creates jobs it's the people who buy stuff and create demand. Then someone will meet that demand and potentially hire someone. I don't think Apple "creates" jobs. It hires people for certain needs that have been created by the market. If they don't fill the need somebody else will do in a market economy.

I disagree, I would suspect that most Apple employees are probably engaged in creating new products that have not been bought yet..

Re: Apple plans new U.S. campus, to pay $38B in foreign cash taxes

#47

I find it fascinating that a tax plan proposed by a President reviled throughout the Valley is the one thing that finally convinced Apple to repatriate much of its overseas cash and invest it here in the US. They of course give no credit to him in this press release, but the proof is in the pudding. Of the many heavy handed ideas and efforts made by the previous administration to convince Apple to do this, exactly 0…

Apple is a one of a kind company. In my opinion, I don't think most US Corporations are concerned with the needs of the many.

Re: Apple plans new U.S. campus, to pay $38B in foreign cash taxes

#48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Corporations have a legal obligation to their shareholders to maximize their profits. If they did something as negligent as paying taxes they didn't have to pay, and that none of their competitors pay, they'd be opening themselves up to a lawsuit from shareholders. Laws are weird.

Source?

obligation definitely would come from the board+investors..who would kick out any ceo who doesn't maximise profit

Re: Apple plans new U.S. campus, to pay $38B in foreign cash taxes

#49

All the comments seem to be sketpical or negative. I think it's funny if you go back right before tax reform passed and look at all the comments on articles here on HN almost all were blasting tax reform. Saying it won't work, it does not help the economy, does not create jobs, and repatriation only leads to stock buybacks and executive bonuses. So far we've seen company after company giving substantial bonuses to al…

To be fair the bonuses I've heard about have been laughable so far and accompanied by large lay offs in two cases (Walmart and Comcast).

$1,000 is not laughable to most people.

Re: Apple plans new U.S. campus, to pay $38B in foreign cash taxes

#50

I find it fascinating that a tax plan proposed by a President reviled throughout the Valley is the one thing that finally convinced Apple to repatriate much of its overseas cash and invest it here in the US. They of course give no credit to him in this press release, but the proof is in the pudding. Of the many heavy handed ideas and efforts made by the previous administration to convince Apple to do this, exactly 0…

Apple is a one of a kind company. In my opinion, I don't think most US Corporations are concerned with the needs of the many.

And you think Apple is? Why?
Post reply on HN