More than a little disturbing. They talk about helping developing economies, but what you can bet this means is that they'll be screwing over those people some way or another. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldman_Sachs#2007%E2%80%93200... http://fortune.com/2016/04/11/goldman-sachs-doj-settlement/ This is the end game of cryptocurrencies; not worldwide financial liberation but the same massive financial institutions…
The problem in hyperinflationary situations isn't lack of access to hard currency, it is usually readily available on the black market. The problem is the lack of affordability of hard currency. How many US dollars do I get for this piece of hyperinflating funny money? Probably not many. Bitcoin is really no different from transacting in US dollars or any other hard currency, in fact it's arguably worse in pretty muc…
Goldman Sachs Report Explores Use of Bitcoin as Currency
201–210 of 222 posts
Re: Goldman Sachs Report Explores Use of Bitcoin as Currency
#202Earlier quoted context omitted.
Please explain how the Lightning Network developers solve an unsolved NP-Hard problem in computer science regarding routing? [1] The Lightning Network design is exactly what the first sentence of Satoshi's Bitcoin whitepaper seeks to avoid - payment processor middlemen. "A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a f…
seems like you've heard the term and quickly decided that it describes something unsolvable in principle. the truth is, that NP-hardness is only true for perfect solution in polynomial time. good-enough solutions can be found in finite time intervals just fine, there are plenty of practical implementations of that. ever heard of this thing called "delivery companies"? well they solve TSP sub-optimally millions of tim…
Latency?
Let's look at the Lightening network white paper:
8.4 Payment Routing
It is theoretically possible to build a route map
implicitly from observing 2-of-2 multisigs on the
blockchain to build a routing table. Note, however, this
is not feasible with pay-to-script-hash transaction
outputs, which can be resolved out-of-band from the
bitcoin protocol via a third party routing service.
Building a routing table will become necessary for large
operators (e.g. BGP, Cjdns). Eventually, with
optimizations, the network will look a lot like the
correspondent banking network, or Tier-1 ISPs.
So LN cites the need for large liquidity providers to act as hubs, essentially payment processor hubs.Why not just use venmo at that point?
Why would someone want to use Bitcoin with the LN, especially if it requires them buying Bitcoin from someone else?
Re: Goldman Sachs Report Explores Use of Bitcoin as Currency
#203Bitcoin and blockchain systems are nearly all designed to exploit new users and extract capital from greater fools who are too late to the game and didn't read or understand the rules and fine print. Satoshi's Bitcoin and many of the crypto-currencies that have followed create and distribute the supply that effectively creates a decentralized pyramid-ponzi scheme. Semantically, a more accurate term is needed; Bitcoin…
1. Early bitcoin users shoulder more risk than later users. They are rewarded for pushing the blockchain forward. You could argue disproportionately, but the rules are set in stone from the beginning. 3. There are other coins that do not require asics or have as high of energy cost. 5. What exactly is a government going to do? They could perhaps take control of the chain? The cost would be enormous. They could attemp…
5. Ban exchanges, make sales/purchase illegal like how localbitcoin dealers being arrested for money transmission violations.
Re: Goldman Sachs Report Explores Use of Bitcoin as Currency
#204Earlier quoted context omitted.
US dollar is supported by a government (or more precisely a central bank) just like Greece and Venezuela is. But who supports the government? A government can default. The USD can default. It is only in very recent times that currencies have been stable (at the cost of having to grow the economy to beat the inflation) historically they haven't. Just ask the Germans in the 30ies. It's an illusion to think that just be…
I didn't say it's exempt from losing value, however we have some fairly good means of trying to ensure that doesn't happen, which have been relatively successful of late. With Cryptocurrencies there are none, by design. >> Bitcoin has more utility than a clone because it has a unique history and a unique set of backers (the network) and those backers have exactly the same function as they state. This is utter nonsens…
There is always a reality. That same reality plays out differently with bitcoin compared to the USD but fundamentally there is no absolute base for either currency nor bitcoin. And history is littered with examples of this.
Re: Goldman Sachs Report Explores Use of Bitcoin as Currency
#205Earlier quoted context omitted.
seems like you've heard the term and quickly decided that it describes something unsolvable in principle. the truth is, that NP-hardness is only true for perfect solution in polynomial time. good-enough solutions can be found in finite time intervals just fine, there are plenty of practical implementations of that. ever heard of this thing called "delivery companies"? well they solve TSP sub-optimally millions of tim…
Right... except the internet is not a physical space so tell me how do you measure distance between nodes? Latency? Let's look at the Lightening network white paper: 8.4 Payment Routing It is theoretically possible to build a route map implicitly from observing 2-of-2 multisigs on the blockchain to build a routing table. Note, however, this is not feasible with pay-to-script-hash transaction outputs, which can be res…
Re: Goldman Sachs Report Explores Use of Bitcoin as Currency
#206Earlier quoted context omitted.
Right... except the internet is not a physical space so tell me how do you measure distance between nodes? Latency? Let's look at the Lightening network white paper: 8.4 Payment Routing It is theoretically possible to build a route map implicitly from observing 2-of-2 multisigs on the blockchain to build a routing table. Note, however, this is not feasible with pay-to-script-hash transaction outputs, which can be res…
Unsurprisingly your reply has nothing to do with your original speculation that LN can’t work because of TSP.
The routing problem of internet nodes:
the internet is not a physical space so tell me how do you
measure distance between nodes?
To which you have no answer.As stated in the OP:
LN can't solve the TSP without either publishing a map of
all nodes and routes, or having all nodes broadcasts to all nodes.
Unsurprisingly you didn't read the original post, nor contribute any response to the critique or technical implementation of routing in the LN design.LN relies on hubs and a map. It's setup to extract wealth into centralized liquidity providers. This is antithetical to cash, and at this point why not use a faster centralized service like venmo?
Re: Goldman Sachs Report Explores Use of Bitcoin as Currency
#207Earlier quoted context omitted.
Indeed. It also requires considerable levels of technical literacy to use, maintain, and properly secure blockchain tokens, and even with all that people regularly have their bitcoins stolen or irreparably lost.
I love how Fiat Money was designed to be impossible to use for illegal purposes, and there is no way to steal it. I mean really, if there were a way for it to be used in that way, surely your argument would be pointless, but luckily we know that the more middlemen we introduce between us and another party, the more affordable the transaction will become.
So, I catch the meaning behind your sarcastic quip, but all you're doing here is offering up an absurd strawman. Obviously any currency can be stolen or used for illegal purposes, that's a willfully disingenuous interpretation of the argument because nobody has ever said that. This kind of reasoning would be like if someone said "the nature of dynamic typing makes the code prone to error" and you respond with "I love how strong static types were designed to make bugs impossible to produce, and there is no way it will cause the program to crash unexpectedly".
Re: Goldman Sachs Report Explores Use of Bitcoin as Currency
#208Earlier quoted context omitted.
Unsurprisingly your reply has nothing to do with your original speculation that LN can’t work because of TSP.
??? The routing problem of internet nodes: the internet is not a physical space so tell me how do you measure distance between nodes? To which you have no answer. As stated in the OP: LN can't solve the TSP without either publishing a map of all nodes and routes, or having all nodes broadcasts to all nodes. Unsurprisingly you didn't read the original post, nor contribute any response to the critique or technical impl…
You’re the one that claimed connection to TSP, you tell me.
Re: Goldman Sachs Report Explores Use of Bitcoin as Currency
#209Earlier quoted context omitted.
I didn't say it's exempt from losing value, however we have some fairly good means of trying to ensure that doesn't happen, which have been relatively successful of late. With Cryptocurrencies there are none, by design. >> Bitcoin has more utility than a clone because it has a unique history and a unique set of backers (the network) and those backers have exactly the same function as they state. This is utter nonsens…
No it's not nonsense at all. A country can default no matter the intentions and attempts of it's government. There is always a reality. That same reality plays out differently with bitcoin compared to the USD but fundamentally there is no absolute base for either currency nor bitcoin. And history is littered with examples of this.
The nonsense part was you saying that the BTC community back the currency like a government. They can't, the currency doesn't work that way.
Re: Goldman Sachs Report Explores Use of Bitcoin as Currency
#210Earlier quoted context omitted.
No it's not nonsense at all. A country can default no matter the intentions and attempts of it's government. There is always a reality. That same reality plays out differently with bitcoin compared to the USD but fundamentally there is no absolute base for either currency nor bitcoin. And history is littered with examples of this.
That's not what I called nonsense. The nonsense part was you saying that the BTC community back the currency like a government. They can't, the currency doesn't work that way.