21–30 of 95 posts
Blackmail as a lawsuit. Have to be careful who you trust these days.
So, unless there is something worse that Levandowski would know she knows that would come out if the allegations in the lawsuit were litigated, this is not likely to be “blackmail as lawsuit”.
"Wong also claims knowledge of a large swath of Levandowski’s personal and business dealings. She does so in great detail, including dozens of overheard names, the license-plate numbers of cars she observed at a Levandowski property, and an extensive list of the BDSM gear she claims he kept in his bedroom." This sounds a lot like she was spying on him for trade secrets. Also, the BDSM gear is completely irrelevant to…
The only reason to ever publicise stuff like that is to smear someone. Its low and it undermines any legitimate claim. I'm sure a defense would point out the vexacious nature of those publications.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes...it's like the Damore lawsuit...designed for maximal embarrassment with goal of quick settlement.
How is the Damore lawsuit embarrassing to Google? From my perspective it's really only embarrassing for him.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The only reason to ever publicise stuff like that is to smear someone. Its low and it undermines any legitimate claim. I'm sure a defense would point out the vexacious nature of those publications.
It will never reach a courtroom. He will settle long before that. He has too much at stake for her to take the stand and be questioned.
I knew Anthony some years ago. It was clear to me from day one that not all was right with his way of interacting with the world.
I suppose his nanny apparently had enough emotional intelligence to pick up on this and enough situational awareness to take notes.
I wish there were a safe way to share this, especially if it turned out to be useful in any way beyond schadenfreude.
I guess she didn't sign an NDA. Also this guy sounds like the American Psycho guy of Tech.
"Wong also claims knowledge of a large swath of Levandowski’s personal and business dealings. She does so in great detail, including dozens of overheard names, the license-plate numbers of cars she observed at a Levandowski property, and an extensive list of the BDSM gear she claims he kept in his bedroom." This sounds a lot like she was spying on him for trade secrets. Also, the BDSM gear is completely irrelevant to…
> This sounds a lot like she was spying on him for trade secrets. Also, the BDSM gear is completely irrelevant to anything. Without access to the actual complaint, there's little basis for the first sentence and none for the second.