I'm confused, did i do something wrong or why can i find the referred article just fine on google, just by searching the keywords? https://imgur.com/a/szBcB
becuase the OP wrote an article that links to these things, and caused them to be re-indexed. It's not purely a function of 'date published' it is also about frequency of access
Google Memory Loss
51–60 of 552 posts
Re: Google Memory Loss
#52Re: Google Memory Loss
#53I've convinced myself that this happens in gmail / hangouts history search too. It'll very confidently tell you that here are the only six results for your search term going back to the beginning of time, but if you go and manually dig up something that you know is there from ten years ago, then all of a sudden there are seven results the next time you search for the same term. I haven't done this methodically, and I…
Re: Google Memory Loss
#54Re: Google Memory Loss
#55Re: Google Memory Loss
#56DuckDuckGo seems to have no problem returning the result, even with general terms: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=tim+bray+rock+roll+animal
Re: Google Memory Loss
#57I'm confused, did i do something wrong or why can i find the referred article just fine on google, just by searching the keywords? https://imgur.com/a/szBcB
Re: Google Memory Loss
#58Re: Google Memory Loss
#59https://www.google.com/search?q="we+were+watching+the+Democr... I can find the article this person is referring just by looking at a string of it. So the article _is_ indexed. Not sure what he is referring to.
Its possible that by linking to his article he triggered a re-indexing of it? I wont pretend to know how google works but seems plausible to me.
Re: Google Memory Loss
#60The style used for the links borders on vulgarity.