For those that haven't heard of TRON, it is what I would call one of the most successful scams in the history of cryptocurrency. It is a currency that was made on top of Ethereum (thus, it took no actual effort to create, as this can be done instantly and for free), paired with a significant amount of hype and lies to investors. The TRON Whitepaper (what investors are 'supposed' to read and invest off of) is written…
Don't forget the senior Alibaba Developers lol
LGPL violation/Missing references to Ethereumj project
21–30 of 68 posts
Re: LGPL violation/Missing references to Ethereumj project
#22Re: LGPL violation/Missing references to Ethereumj project
#23That is so blatant:
https://github.com/tronprotocol/java-tron/blob/develop/src/m...
https://github.com/jnorthrup/sphlib/blob/master/src/main/jav...
It's written right there in the license block they cut and replaced "The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software".
Re: LGPL violation/Missing references to Ethereumj project
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
Tron foundation website is a "showcase" of the ceo guy, nothing more.
Gotta admit, he is a DAMN good marketer
It's very interesting to see how bubbles plays out. I do think cryptocurrencies are real and have big potential, but after seeing likes tron, verge, and doge, I also believe the current valuations are biggest bubbles of our lifetimes. Yet, you see people justifying ~10b$ valuation on the premise of a whitepaper written with broken english, then partnerships that are merely vaporware (remember iota announced msft partnership, yet it was more like iota was using azure products).
Interesting times. Just play into people's irrational decisions and you'd make big bucks.
Re: LGPL violation/Missing references to Ethereumj project
#25Is tron name itself a violation of trademark, or copyright of Disney? Not much knowledgable on IP laws in the US, hence the question.
Titles can't be copyrighted. Words can be trademarked, but they aren't exclusive. As long as there is no risk of confusion, then the same word can be trademarked by different people for different purposes. Think: Apple Computer vs Apple the record label -- it wasn't an issue until Apple Computer started getting into the music business.
Re: LGPL violation/Missing references to Ethereumj project
#26A little more analysis about cube: https://medium.com/@ak239spb/how-to-build-fake-ico-9f837a4eb...
Re: LGPL violation/Missing references to Ethereumj project
#27Re: LGPL violation/Missing references to Ethereumj project
#28I like that people publish their code and then cry when people take it. The area between FOSS and proprietary software is a purgatory for people with analysis paralysis that can’t pick a fucking side.
Re: LGPL violation/Missing references to Ethereumj project
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
Gotta admit, he is a DAMN good marketer
More like a prophet at this point. It's very interesting to see how bubbles plays out. I do think cryptocurrencies are real and have big potential, but after seeing likes tron, verge, and doge, I also believe the current valuations are biggest bubbles of our lifetimes. Yet, you see people justifying ~10b$ valuation on the premise of a whitepaper written with broken english, then partnerships that are merely vaporware…
Re: LGPL violation/Missing references to Ethereumj project
#30Phew! As the owner of https://tron.pk I literally spilled my morning coffee over the keyboard, just reading the title.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0U5n2WaMMHo
I think Apple have the same basic design, just they use the motherboard, which has to be replaced after each spill ;)