Intel Security Issue Update: Initial Performance Data Results for Client Systems
1–10 of 43 posts
Re: Intel Security Issue Update: Initial Performance Data Results for Client Systems
#2With what mitigation config? IBRS? IBPB?
Re: Intel Security Issue Update: Initial Performance Data Results for Client Systems
#3Surely this is written by his PR department and the techies are ashamed of the numbers & interpertation.
Re: Intel Security Issue Update: Initial Performance Data Results for Client Systems
#4Even in these PR figures, the SYSMark 2014 SE Responsiveness test results, a benchmark addition which was specifically created to unearth pain-points in typical everyday user activities, gets a serious wallop.
Re: Intel Security Issue Update: Initial Performance Data Results for Client Systems
#5The performance hit is (supposedly) much more significant on Haswell and older, which they forgot to include.
Re: Intel Security Issue Update: Initial Performance Data Results for Client Systems
#6The performance hit is (supposedly) much more significant on Haswell and older, which they forgot to include.
How convenient.
Re: Intel Security Issue Update: Initial Performance Data Results for Client Systems
#7> As of today, we still have not received any information that these exploits have been used to obtain customer data. We know our customers are eager for updates, and via this blog, I will personally communicate with you the information that we have to share today and in the future.
Seriously? To Intel, all of the world is just overreacted?
Re: Intel Security Issue Update: Initial Performance Data Results for Client Systems
#8> As of today, we still have not received any information that these exploits have been used to obtain customer data. We know our customers are eager for updates, and via this blog, I will personally communicate with you the information that we have to share today and in the future. Seriously? To Intel, all of the world is just overreacted?
The original Project Zero announcement also contained the fact that they aren't aware of in-the-wild exploits, does that mean they say they themselves are overreacting, or are they merely providing information?
Re: Intel Security Issue Update: Initial Performance Data Results for Client Systems
#9> As of today, we still have not received any information that these exploits have been used to obtain customer data. We know our customers are eager for updates, and via this blog, I will personally communicate with you the information that we have to share today and in the future. Seriously? To Intel, all of the world is just overreacted?
The original Project Zero announcement also contained the fact that they aren't aware of in-the-wild exploits, does that mean they say they themselves are overreacting, or are they merely providing information?
It's too early to say, it's not known _yet_. Are you waiting for a first case to fix your bugs?
Re: Intel Security Issue Update: Initial Performance Data Results for Client Systems
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
The original Project Zero announcement also contained the fact that they aren't aware of in-the-wild exploits, does that mean they say they themselves are overreacting, or are they merely providing information?
It's too early to say, it's not known _yet_. Are you waiting for a first case to fix your bugs?
Where are they saying anything about not fixing bugs? And like it or not, with the issues of the available patches breaking machines, virus scanner incompatibilities, ..., organisations will have to make decisions about when to patch.