It doesn't say what type of aircraft guests would fly on.
It does, but it's hidden at the bottom of the FAQ [1] page. I agree with the other comments about how they could do a better job of surfacing this kind of information. > We fly the beautiful Bombardier CRJ Series and Embraer ERJ Series. These are regional planes with 50 to 100 passenger seats. These planes are the same planes that are used by United Express, Delta Connection, and American Airlines. [1] - https://www.…
Show HN: Monthly subscription airline with SFO-LAX flights starting at $78
61–70 of 169 posts
Re: Show HN: Monthly subscription airline with SFO-LAX flights starting at $78
#62I could see Aviato moving into this space...
Re: Show HN: Monthly subscription airline with SFO-LAX flights starting at $78
#63The screenshot shows 55 minute travel times, is that real? Current airlines generally schedule 1h25 to 1h45.
Re: Show HN: Monthly subscription airline with SFO-LAX flights starting at $78
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
Enjoy your 12 hour train ride.
You can get a ride with under 2 hours, if you do an actual express train.... see the ICE Sprinter Berlin-Munich, which has more stops than necessary, and does not even drive at the seed we have the technology for.
Re: Show HN: Monthly subscription airline with SFO-LAX flights starting at $78
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm constantly tempted by Surf Air as I've lived as close as 2mi from San Carlos airport (KSQL!) and now live 6mi from it, and my parents live 2 miles from Palomar Airport (KCRQ) which is a good 30 minute drive (in GOOD traffic; their commute traffic often puts the Bay Area to shame). Even with the slower flying time it would save me hours. Unfortunately, I don't "commute", so it's hard to justify a price nearing $2k…
The ICAO code is KSQL!
Re: Show HN: Monthly subscription airline with SFO-LAX flights starting at $78
#66Re: Show HN: Monthly subscription airline with SFO-LAX flights starting at $78
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm constantly tempted by Surf Air as I've lived as close as 2mi from San Carlos airport (KSQL!) and now live 6mi from it, and my parents live 2 miles from Palomar Airport (KCRQ) which is a good 30 minute drive (in GOOD traffic; their commute traffic often puts the Bay Area to shame). Even with the slower flying time it would save me hours. Unfortunately, I don't "commute", so it's hard to justify a price nearing $2k…
You could get into partial plane ownership and fly yourself for far less than their $1,950/mo fee. The upfront investment is higher since you'll need a pilot's license. :-)
Re: Show HN: Monthly subscription airline with SFO-LAX flights starting at $78
#68I applaud the audacity of starting an airline from scratch, considering it's way up there in terms of capital requirements and regulatory burden, and the industry has been losing money in the US, collectively, since the Carter administration. But it needs to be said that SFO LAX is, at just 300 miles, and with the high demand shown by such startups, a perfect example of everything that is wrong with transportation in…
Re: Show HN: Monthly subscription airline with SFO-LAX flights starting at $78
#69Re: Show HN: Monthly subscription airline with SFO-LAX flights starting at $78
#70Maybe a good idea, but the site does a bad job of selling it. The front page starts with a big rant about how bad existing airlines are. That's not how you sell things. You should focus on what you do, which is SFO-LAX flights through private terminals on a monthly subscription. The private terminal is a huge win -- it saves a good hour on travel. But that's buried in the FAQ. You should redesign so that all of the f…