Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think that you are refering to binaural beats : http://gnaural.sourceforge.net/ You need a stereo headset to listen to this. There is a frequency in one ear and another one slightly off in the second ear. Your brain then merge the two sine waves and intepret both as a single, low frequency "beat" of the difference.
No, i'm saying that PWM-encoding data in microwaves produces low frequency beats in the final transmitted wave, similar to the frequency of binaural beats (~10-30hz alpha and beta brain wave range). I was joking that i could iDose with wifi in the same way as binaural beats. I'll try and find one of the papers.
Banning Wi-Fi From Schools
31–33 of 33 posts
Re: Banning Wi-Fi From Schools
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
> wrap our houses in faraday cages Hmm... I am concerned that the big solar flare might come one day and usher the world into a new dark age... or at least a victorian period of about 20 to 30 years.
You'll have to cut your access to your power supply and go on generator (anything outside the faraday cage risks frying anything electrical inside), you'd also have to disconnect any groundings to pipework. Long runs of copper will be inducted during a huge flare, so the ground/earthing connections can at best knock off all your breakers and your generator, but at worse can surge from ground->neutral (frequently conn…
Well if people are going to worry about solar flares, they might as well figure on EMP (electromagnetic pulse) protection from high altitude nukes too. Energy levels can be very high, and the very short pulse risetime results in energy extending to at least the VHF range. That means relatively short conductors can function as efficient antennas, picking up considerable energy. Solar events are lower frequency, so energy from longer conductors such as power lines is the first thing to worry about there.
It is silly for those people to be worried about WiFi, but some just don't have a clue as to the differences between ionizing radiation and electromagnetic radiation (and the importance of power levels). But the same folks will gab with a cell phone against their heads...
Re: Banning Wi-Fi From Schools
#33More information about the biological effects of non-ionizing radiation from wireless technology is coming out every day. Enough is not being done by cities, counties, states and the Federal Government to protect us from the potentially devastating health and environmental effects. Through the 1996 telecommunications act the telecoms are shielded from liability and oversight. Initially cell phones were released with no pre-market safety testing despite the fact the Government and the Military have known for over 50 years that radio frequency is harmful to all biological systems (inthesenewtimes dot com/2009/05/02/6458/.). Health studies were suppressed and the 4 trillion dollar a year industry was given what amounts to a license to kill.
On it's face, the 1996 telecommunications act is unconstitutional and a cover-up. Within the fine print city governments are not allowed to consider "environmental" effects from cell towers. They should anyway! It is the moral and legal obligation of our government to protect our health and welfare? Or is it? When did this become an obsolete concept? A cell tower is a microwave weapon capable of causing cancer, genetic damage & other biological problems. Bees, bats, humans, plants and trees are all affected by RF & EMF. Communities fight to keep cell towers away from schools yet they allow the school boards to install wi fi in all of our schools thereby irradiating our kids for 6-7 hours each day. Kids go home and the genetic assault continues with DECT portable phones, cell phones, wi fi and Wii's. A tsunami of cancers and early alzheimer's await our kids. Young people under the age of 20 are 420% more at risk of forming brain tumors (Swedish study, Dr. Lennart Hardell) because of their soft skulls, brain size and cell turn over time. Instead of teaching "safer" cell phone use and the dangers of wireless technology our schools mindlessly rush to wireless bending to industry pressure rather than informed decision making. We teach about alcohol, tobacco, drugs and safe sex but not about "safer" cell phone use. We are in a wireless trance, scientists are panicking while young brains, ovaries and sperm burns.