Earlier quoted context omitted.
> what I'm usually missing in those is the actual difference in calorie intake... Check out "That Sugar Film," it was on Amazon Prime when I saw it. Highly recommend. In it, he goes from a zero-sugar diet to a "recommend healthy amount of sugar" (and from "healthy" sources — he is not eating candy) while maintaining the same calorie count and exercise routine. Spoiler: he gains weight and inches and develops a fatty…
He went from zero refined sugar to 200g of sugar a day. The average in America is 125g and nobody would recommend anywhere near either amount. He also only ate packaged foods - presumably no vegetables, rice, pasta etc. It's hard to see how any lessons can be learned from this. And as for the talking heads he chose, well... http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/medical_exa...
I still think there is a lesson to be learned. If we can assume his calorie intake remained the same (which he claims, but given your link, who knows), we can say that the source of the calories matters. I've met a few people who only subscribe to calories in vs calories out.