Live data from Hacker News

Quantum 'spooky action at a distance' becoming practical?

phys.org

1–10 of 45 posts

Re: Quantum 'spooky action at a distance' becoming practical?

#5

"This was possible to achieve thanks to state of art photon source and detection technology" What's a photon source thats not a lamp/laser?

I have not read the full article, but usually you need a laser which can produce single photons and which can control their polarisation (Other sources produce quantum superpositions of having 1 photon, 2 photons, 4 photons, etc. It's a probability distribution containing all those numbers).

Re: Quantum 'spooky action at a distance' becoming practical?

#9

"This was possible to achieve thanks to state of art photon source and detection technology" What's a photon source thats not a lamp/laser?

You usually need single photon sources or SPDC.

Don’t you need SPDC to get entangled photons anyway?

Re: Quantum 'spooky action at a distance' becoming practical?

#10
post #7

Quantum entanglement is such a neat phenomenon, but secure communication feels like such a boring application. How much extra security would a quantumly protected communication channel provide over just using some really heavy encryption sent in a normal manner?

That observation of the communication would break the link, versus capture and (attempt to) decrypt?
Post reply on HN