Live data from Hacker News

Border Search of Electronic Devices – CBP Directive [pdf]

cbp.gov

21–30 of 110 posts

Re: Border Search of Electronic Devices – CBP Directive [pdf]

#21
post #14

Never is there any mention that by accessing the device of person A, the officer may be violating the rights of all people (say persons B, C, and D) who have shared information in confidence with person A. This includes getting access to my family photos. I don’t want an officer, who self selected by applying for a job that he knows will give him access to family photos, to get access to my family photos, because wha…

There is not generally a right to confidentiality of information you share with a third party. There are a few exceptions (spouses, doctors, lawyers, among others). If party A shares information with party B outside one of these protected relationships, then I guess A's rights will not be violated if their information is discovered in party B's possession, whether or not party B shares that information voluntarily. (…

That really depends on the jurisdiction. For example in Germany it is illegal to share pictures of persons not being yourself without the other party's agreement. Google Translate does a decent enough job on the German Wikipedia entry:

https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&...

Re: Border Search of Electronic Devices – CBP Directive [pdf]

#22
Are there any devices offering a silent panic passcode? It would be convenient for travelers if "123456" unlocked the device and "987654" erased local information and unlocked the device.

That way a properly backed up device could be carried across a border with risk only of inconvenience, not of data loss.

(The passcodes I showed are my passcodes. :-) Nobody else use them, OK?)

Re: Border Search of Electronic Devices – CBP Directive [pdf]

#23
post #6

So what do we do if the CBP asks us to hand our devices over? Is there any way we can tell them to fly a kite?

Are you a US Citizen? Are you willing to temporarily (temporarily in this case is not implying a short duration, btw) lose your device? Are you able to waste time (as in hours or unlikely but possibly days) at CBP defending your rights without negative repercussions (as in missed flights, possibly missed work, missed family obligations, etc)? If the answer is yes to all, then sure, politely refuse and stand your grou…

Also, note that refusal to comply with ANY direction by CBP results in permanent unappealable revocation of trusted traveler status.

Re: Border Search of Electronic Devices – CBP Directive [pdf]

#24

Are there any devices offering a silent panic passcode? It would be convenient for travelers if "123456" unlocked the device and "987654" erased local information and unlocked the device. That way a properly backed up device could be carried across a border with risk only of inconvenience, not of data loss. (The passcodes I showed are my passcodes. :-) Nobody else use them, OK?)

IANAL but previously when I have heard that question the common response is "this can later be considered intentional destruction of evidence and/or obstructing justice and can also be used as grounds for further detention because you must have something to hide"

EDIT: Also a commenter below reminded me that not obeying any order given to you by CBP/law enforcement is a direct violation of previously agreed to rules of the trusted traveler programs (Global Entry/TSA Pre, maybe even CLEAR?) which would cause you to be removed from any/all of those programs.

Re: Border Search of Electronic Devices – CBP Directive [pdf]

#25
One thing to note: "This directive governs border searches of electronic devices -- including... at the extended border." The "extended border" extends a hundred miles from what we normally consider the border; the authorization for customs agents to conduct warrantless searches in the Immigration and Naturalization Act allows them "within a reasonable distance from any external boundary of the United States," and the Attorney General defined that distance as a hundred miles. The Supreme Court disagrees (Almeida-Sanchez v. U.S., U.S. v. Martinez-Fuente), and has ruled that border searches can only be done, well, at the border. Under this directive, an importer/exporter headquartered in downtown San Diego would be subject to these searches... a bit scary if the Supreme Court ever overturns its earlier border search decisions.

Re: Border Search of Electronic Devices – CBP Directive [pdf]

#27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> It might raise some suspicion if you unlocked your phone and they discovered you were logged out of everything, and there was nothing on the phone. There are countries[0] I travel to where that’s exactly what they find, essentially a freshly wiped phone. Hasn’t raised suspicion yet. [0] it’s also how I travel to certain security conferences. Buy a used/refurbished device before, use for duration of event, sell imme…

> sell [device] immediately after I've heard people say that if their laptop or phone were searched out of their sight by border officials, they'd sell it afterward. But is it ethical? I think this meat might be contaminated; I'm not going to risk eating it, so I'll sell it.

I'd consider it my lucky day and auction it off to security researchers.

Re: Border Search of Electronic Devices – CBP Directive [pdf]

#28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> But is it ethical? Oh, the e-word! The word that has an entirely different meaning to every person you ask and more often than not, when it’s drug out in an Internet debate it turns into a pseudo-Gotwin’s Law alternative. I’ll spin is back to you to prove the point. Is it ethical the work environment that the device you are using to reply to me with was built in? Is it ethical that it was built with environmentally…

Sorry if I started the discussion provocatively. I'm thinking that there should be an alternative to throwing a $1000+ device in the garbage or passing the (potential) problem onto someone else. I don't know if there are any other alternatives, but I wanted to have a discussion from that angle.

Snowden is working on this I think: https://www.fastcompany.com/40466986/edward-snowden-bunnie-h...

Re: Border Search of Electronic Devices – CBP Directive [pdf]

#29
post #25

One thing to note: "This directive governs border searches of electronic devices -- including... at the extended border." The "extended border" extends a hundred miles from what we normally consider the border; the authorization for customs agents to conduct warrantless searches in the Immigration and Naturalization Act allows them "within a reasonable distance from any external boundary of the United States," and th…

Yes, it’s indeed over the top. Here’s a map by the ACLU: https://goo.gl/images/HpPYby

Re: Border Search of Electronic Devices – CBP Directive [pdf]

#30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is not generally a right to confidentiality of information you share with a third party. There are a few exceptions (spouses, doctors, lawyers, among others). If party A shares information with party B outside one of these protected relationships, then I guess A's rights will not be violated if their information is discovered in party B's possession, whether or not party B shares that information voluntarily. (…

That really depends on the jurisdiction. For example in Germany it is illegal to share pictures of persons not being yourself without the other party's agreement. Google Translate does a decent enough job on the German Wikipedia entry: https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&...

The article in discussion is the US CBP, so the jurisdiction is pretty clearly the US and not Germany.
Post reply on HN