How an A.I. ‘Cat-And-Mouse Game’ Generates Believable Fake Photos
51–60 of 83 posts
Re: How an A.I. ‘Cat-And-Mouse Game’ Generates Believable Fake Photos
#52Good article and great tech. However, I don't know if I believe the results are as good as they claim. Many of the pictures look a bit off to me, like they all have dead eyes. Maybe celebrities generally look like that anyway, so it is being true to form. :) In particular, I think this guy is missing a pretty significant part of his head: https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/2017/12/26/ai-faces/8e...
Re: How an A.I. ‘Cat-And-Mouse Game’ Generates Believable Fake Photos
#53I’d be really worried if I was a photo model.
Re: How an A.I. ‘Cat-And-Mouse Game’ Generates Believable Fake Photos
#54Scary to think where this will be in 10 years. Perhaps even video evidence will be hard to believe any more. How do you convict someone if this technology is mature?
And or how do you prove someone's innocence if you can generate a believable, fake, crime video. Supporting counter evidence will become that much more important.
Re: How an A.I. ‘Cat-And-Mouse Game’ Generates Believable Fake Photos
#55Good article and great tech. However, I don't know if I believe the results are as good as they claim. Many of the pictures look a bit off to me, like they all have dead eyes. Maybe celebrities generally look like that anyway, so it is being true to form. :) In particular, I think this guy is missing a pretty significant part of his head: https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/2017/12/26/ai-faces/8e...
The hair was the giveaway to me. I stared at the two "which one is real" images for a couple minutes thinking, "They both have that fake looking wavy hair, I thought for sure neither was real." Cheap trick NYTimes. Cheap.
Re: How an A.I. ‘Cat-And-Mouse Game’ Generates Believable Fake Photos
#56Re: How an A.I. ‘Cat-And-Mouse Game’ Generates Believable Fake Photos
#57I don't understand the images associated with that article. They purport to show the progressive refinement of the output over a series of days. But the figure changes dramatically from image to image, all the way to the end of the run. At the very least it seems the output is not stable: a human has to decide when to stop the Wheel of Fortune. It looks more like a series of images taken from different training sets…
>How do you solve the 'where to stop' problem if the output is so unstable?
Looking at the discriminator loss would be a good start for that.
Re: How an A.I. ‘Cat-And-Mouse Game’ Generates Believable Fake Photos
#58Excellent images and the more I think about what this could be used for the creepier it gets. One day, truly, software will be very dangerous.
How can such a thing be enforced to begin with?
Are companies/labs/universities/individuals themselves the only thing standing between fair play and massive misuse of realistically generated media?